Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: What is the TLS WG plan for quantum-resistant algorithms?

2023-11-06 Thread Yoav Nir
> On 7 Nov 2023, at 0:29, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL > wrote: > > Do we want rfc describing the final NIST standards? And for which? I'm ok > with that — in this order of priority: ml-kem, ml-dsa, slh-dsa. > > Probably yes, and in the order you described. Sure, as long as by

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: What is the TLS WG plan for quantum-resistant algorithms?

2023-11-06 Thread Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Do we want rfc describing the final NIST standards? And for which? I'm ok with that — in this order of priority: ml-kem, ml-dsa, slh-dsa. Probably yes, and in the order you described. For which algorithms do we want to assign codepoints once the NIST standards are out? Codepoints are