And there’s the link to that issue:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/587
spt
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 15:45, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> I created an issue for this in the tls13 repo so that we can settle on
> whether or not we need to change.
>
> spt
>
>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:59, Benja
I created an issue for this in the tls13 repo so that we can settle on whether
or not we need to change.
spt
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> Jeff Hodges came up with a slightly different proposed rewording at
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg19092.h
Jeff Hodges came up with a slightly different proposed rewording at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg19092.html the last
time this came up, which apparently was just a mail on the list and not
an erratum submission.
-Ben
On 07/26/2016 08:40 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The f
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5246,
"The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5246&eid=4750
-
