rected too.
William
-Original Message-
From: TLS On Behalf Of Peter Wu
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 5:35 AM
To: RFC Errata System
Cc: r...@cert.org; sean+i...@sn3rd.com; ka...@mit.edu; tls@ietf.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6120)
Hi,
In what way is the o
Hi,
In what way is the old writing ambiguous? The semantics of that text is
correct. If someone wants to run the TLS protocol on paper as
"transport", it would still maintain the same guarantees. And "paper" is
arguably not a transport protocol or "stream delivery service".
I suggest to reject
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446,
"The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6120
--
Type: Editorial
