Re: [TLS] (question on ANSI X9.62-2005) Re: Ecdsa-sig-value in TLS 1.3 – need for erratum?

2019-10-01 Thread Dan Brown
Sorry to TLS-WG if this getting out of TLS scope. (Let me know, and I will be happy to cease this thread.) Hi Rene, Did you mean to ask me about the ANSI X9.62 expiration off-list? I’ll assume not, and answer on-list. 1. I was told often by X9 admin and chairs that ANSI X9.62 was

[TLS] (question on ANSI X9.62-2005) Re: Ecdsa-sig-value in TLS 1.3 – need for erratum?

2019-10-01 Thread Rene Struik
Hi Dan: Just curious about the fate of ANSI X9.62-2005: On the website below, this specification is still listed as "active" (whereas ANSI X9.62-1998 is labelled historic). I purchased that spec for a project on Nov 22, 2016 from the ANSI webstore (when, surely, it was not labelled as expired)