On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:02 PM, David Benjamin
wrote:
> Instead of putting 0-RTT data in a ClientHello extension, the current
> draft has the client send extra records in the first flight, right? (I see
> an early_data extension, but it seems only be an indicator. There's
On 27 January 2016 at 13:11, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Well, I think we're generally encouraging people to have to explicitly
> enable 0-RTT.
I think that the key point was that you would have to explicitly
enable 0-RTT AND that also meant a commitment not to choke on 0-RTT
data for
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:02 PM, David Benjamin
> wrote:
>
>> Instead of putting 0-RTT data in a ClientHello extension, the current
>> draft has the client send extra records in the first flight, right?