On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:03 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>- It seems like it should appear with a "Recommended" value of "No",
>and no value in the TLS 1.3 column, since the document says "The Middlebox
>Security Protocol builds on TLS 1.2". [3]
>
>
>
>- Is that what's being
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:02 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>- It seems like it should appear with a "Recommended" value of "No",
>and no value in the TLS 1.3 column, since the document says "The Middlebox
>Security Protocol builds on TLS 1.2". [3]
>
>
>
>- Is that what's being
* It seems like it should appear with a "Recommended" value of "No", and no
value in the TLS 1.3 column, since the document says "The Middlebox Security
Protocol builds on TLS 1.2". [3]
* Is that what's being proposed?
Yes.
___
TLS mailing
In my view, as one of the three designated experts, we already have the only
channel we need, it's the "approved" column.
Anything else -- anything more -- runs counter to our principal of interop over
all.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:20 AM Yoav Nir wrote:
>
> To re-iterate, the policy for the registry is “Specification Required” and
> a specification is available. Unless we hear convincing arguments to the
> contrary, we will approve this allocation. We just prefer to have the
> kerfuffle before
Hiya,
On 19/06/2020 01:36, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:24:05AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> I think these are 16 bit code points? If so, I would
>> barf slightly less if we could allocate 0x0bad every
>> time.
>>
>> I do think signalling opprobrium
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:24:05AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> I think these are 16 bit code points? If so, I would
> barf slightly less if we could allocate 0x0bad every
> time.
>
> I do think signalling opprobrium somehow would be right
> here. Not sure how best we ought do
Hiya,
I think these are 16 bit code points? If so, I would
barf slightly less if we could allocate 0x0bad every
time.
I do think signalling opprobrium somehow would be right
here. Not sure how best we ought do that though tbh.
Cheers,
S.
On 13/06/2020 18:20, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I’m
Hi.
I’m posting this on behalf of the IANA experts for the TLS registries. The IANA
experts function is described in RFC 8447 [1].
We’ve received a request from ETSI to assign three ExtensionType values from
the ExtensionType registry [2]. ETSI is the European Telecommunications
Standards
