Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message splitting and interleaving

2016-11-23 Thread Olivier Levillain
Le 23/11/2016 00:24, Eric Rescorla a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Benjamin > wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:05 PM Olivier Levillain < >> olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I am sorry for the very late answer concerning

Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message splitting and interleaving

2016-11-22 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 23 November 2016 at 10:24, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> [EncryptedExtensions Certifi] > >> [cateRequest Certificate Cer] > >> [tificateVerify Finished] > > > > > > Yeah, that's how this works

Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message splitting and interleaving

2016-11-22 Thread Martin Thomson
On 23 November 2016 at 10:24, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> [EncryptedExtensions Certifi] >> [cateRequest Certificate Cer] >> [tificateVerify Finished] > > > Yeah, that's how this works in NSS. To be clear, NSS buffers an entire flight of messages and then sends them. It might

Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message splitting and interleaving

2016-11-22 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Benjamin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:05 PM Olivier Levillain < > olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we >> (ANSSI) have several remarks after

Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message splitting and interleaving

2016-11-22 Thread David Benjamin
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:05 PM Olivier Levillain < olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote: > Hi list, > > I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we > (ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current > specification. > > We are sorry for the multiple long messages.

[TLS] Draft 18 review : Message splitting and interleaving

2016-11-22 Thread Olivier Levillain
Hi list, I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we (ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current specification. We are sorry for the multiple long messages. If the WG is interested by some of our concerns/proposals, we would be glad to propose some PRs. =