Geoffrey Keating writes:
>That would affect the initial client hello, which I think we're trying to
>keep backwards compatible. It might be better to just define a rule like "if
>multiple extensions with the same number are present, their values are
>concatenated".
A better
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 7:59 PM, William Whyte <
wwh...@securityinnovation.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've updated the TLS 1.3 Quantum Safe Handshake draft to use extensions
> as suggested by DKG in Prague. All comments welcome.
>
> There's an interesting issue here: McEliece keys, which should
William Whyte writes:
> Hi all,
>
> We've updated the TLS 1.3 Quantum Safe Handshake draft to use extensions as
> suggested by DKG in Prague. All comments welcome.
>
> There's an interesting issue here: McEliece keys, which should be
> permissible, are larger in