On 29 Mar 2016, at 5:42 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016 15:09:16 Yoav Nir wrote:
>>> On 29 Mar 2016, at 2:15 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday 25 March 2016 22:07:02 Yoav Nir wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 8:16 PM, Yuhong Bao
> wrote:
>
> I wonder if i
On Tuesday 29 March 2016 15:09:16 Yoav Nir wrote:
> > On 29 Mar 2016, at 2:15 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 25 March 2016 22:07:02 Yoav Nir wrote:
> >>> On 25 Mar 2016, at 8:16 PM, Yuhong Bao
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I wonder if it would be possible to publish
> >>> draft-ietf-tls-5
> On 29 Mar 2016, at 2:15 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
>
> On Friday 25 March 2016 22:07:02 Yoav Nir wrote:
>>> On 25 Mar 2016, at 8:16 PM, Yuhong Bao
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if it would be possible to publish
>>> draft-ietf-tls-56-bit-ciphersuites as Historic (in the sense of RFC
>>> 6101). It
On Friday 25 March 2016 22:07:02 Yoav Nir wrote:
> > On 25 Mar 2016, at 8:16 PM, Yuhong Bao
> > wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if it would be possible to publish
> > draft-ietf-tls-56-bit-ciphersuites as Historic (in the sense of RFC
> > 6101). It would start with
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-i
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 8:16 PM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to publish
> draft-ietf-tls-56-bit-ciphersuites as Historic (in the sense of RFC 6101).
> It would start with
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-56-bit-ciphersuites-01 , but the
> ciphersuites 0x60
