Re: [TLS] RFC4492bis next steps

On 16/03/17 12:52, Yoav Nir wrote: > OK, so I’ll merge the PRs tomorrow morning and start working on ekr’s > comments over the weekend. Excellent, thanks, S > > Yoav > >> On 16 Mar 2017, at 14:41, Stephen Farrell >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 16/03/17 06:20, Yoav

Re: [TLS] RFC4492bis next steps

OK, so I’ll merge the PRs tomorrow morning and start working on ekr’s comments over the weekend. Yoav > On 16 Mar 2017, at 14:41, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > > On 16/03/17 06:20, Yoav Nir wrote: >> Hopefully I’ll be all done and ready to submit a new version as

Re: [TLS] RFC4492bis next steps

On 16/03/17 06:20, Yoav Nir wrote: > Hopefully I’ll be all done and ready to submit a new version as soon > as submissions are re-opened on the 27th. If we're ready sooner, I'd prefer try get that out of the way next week. I can tell to secretariat to accept updates for this draft. (I'll likely

Re: [TLS] RFC4492bis next steps

Thanks Yoav! spt > On Mar 16, 2017, at 02:20, Yoav Nir wrote: > > Hi. > > There are now three PRs pending for this draft: > https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pulls > > These all look fine to me. > > There is also ekr’s review that requires some more changes: >

[TLS] RFC4492bis next steps

Hi. There are now three PRs pending for this draft: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pulls These all look fine to me. There is also ekr’s review that requires some more changes: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg22628.html