>>> Eric Rescorla 11/23/16 2:18 PM >>>
> In general, it should ignore it. It's going to become increasingly common to
> have this be a version you don't support given the recommendation to use
> 0301 and the ongoing deprecation of TLS 1.0. I think it would be fine to
> sanity
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Andreas Walz
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> bringing up this thread again
>
> In the course of studying the way TLS implementations treat the "version"
> (or "legacy_record_version") field in the record header, we were wondering
>
Dear all,
bringing up this thread again
In the course
of studying the way TLS implementations treat the "version" (or
"legacy_record_version") field in the record header, we were wondering
(please excuse if we missed some arguments here from past discussions):
(1)
What is an