Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-08-20 Thread Christopher Wood
This WGLC is now complete. Based on its outcome and past discussions, the chairs believe there is consensus to move forward. There was one important question raised during the WGLC around behavior when receiving unsolicited flags. We will work with the author to prepare a change that addresses

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-08-02 Thread StJohns, Michael
Given that I got a response to a different message on this topic, and that Martin is making a similar point to that I made below, my guess is that this message got lost in the shuffle. On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 19:26 Michael StJohns wrote: > On 7/16/2021 7:55 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: > >

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-08-02 Thread Martin Thomson
I think that this is largely good. I don't like how the IANA registry is structured and would like to discuss it more. I think that it is 0-31 (Standards Action), 32+ (Specification Required), but it doesn't say that. I think that the experimental range (64-79) should not be reserved.

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-31 Thread Salz, Rich
This draft is simple, has had various consensus-things done, and might encourage future experiments. Ship it. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-30 Thread Christopher Wood
Given the few responses received thus far, we're going to extend this WGLC for another two weeks. It will now conclude on August 13, alongside the WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption. Best, Chris, for the chairs On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: > This is the

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-28 Thread Yoav Nir
Thanks for the review. Comments inline. > On 19 Jul 2021, at 2:26, Michael StJohns wrote: > > On 7/16/2021 7:55 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: >> This is the second working group last call for the "A Flags Extension for >> TLS 1.3" draft, available here: >> >>

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-25 Thread Yoav Nir
> On 22 Jul 2021, at 21:35, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 04:55:49PM -0700, Christopher Wood wrote: > >> This is the second working group last call for the "A Flags Extension for >> TLS 1.3" draft, available here: >> >>

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 04:55:49PM -0700, Christopher Wood wrote: > This is the second working group last call for the "A Flags Extension for TLS > 1.3" draft, available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags/ > > Please review this document and send your

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-18 Thread Michael StJohns
On 7/16/2021 7:55 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: This is the second working group last call for the "A Flags Extension for TLS 1.3" draft, available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags/ Please review this document and send your comments to the list by July 30,

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-18 Thread Watson Ladd
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 4:56 PM Christopher Wood wrote: > > This is the second working group last call for the "A Flags Extension for TLS > 1.3" draft, available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags/ > > Please review this document and send your comments to the

[TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-flags

2021-07-16 Thread Christopher Wood
This is the second working group last call for the "A Flags Extension for TLS 1.3" draft, available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags/ Please review this document and send your comments to the list by July 30, 2021. The GitHub repository for this draft is