Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-grease and RFC 7919

2018-06-07 Thread David Benjamin
This value would be kind of weird because this part of RFC 7919 is quite complex. But if there's interest, I don't mind adding some. But I think the TLS 1.2 bits of RFC 7919, particularly the rule you refer to, were a mistake and are best ignored. The benefits of that document are unrealizable to

[TLS] draft-ietf-tls-grease and RFC 7919

2018-06-07 Thread David A. Cooper
I would like to suggest that one additional value be added to the list of GREASE values for named groups. Section 2 of RFC 7919 says:    Codepoints in the "Supported Groups Registry" with a high byte of    0x01 (that is, between 256 and 511, inclusive) are set aside for    FFDHE groups.