On Monday, 22 January 2018 14:39:31 CET Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Monday, 22 January 2018 06:12:30 CET Sean Turner wrote:
> > All,’
> >
> > This is the working group last call for the "Record Size Limit Extension
> > for TLS" draft available at
> >
> This is the working group last call for the "Record Size Limit Extension for
> TLS" draft available at
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-record-limit/. Please review
> the document and send your comments to the list by 6 February 2018.
Section 2: Please update the paragraph
The authors will be posting a new version (-06) that replaces some text
that was missed in the previous version that addressed the WGLC comments.
The -06 version will be sent to the IESG for publication.
Cheers,
Joe
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> Since the count includes the content type byte in TLS 1.3, the maximum
> value for TLS 1.3 is 16385 bytes, not 2^14=16384.
Yes, the editor's copy says:
For TLS 1.2 and earlier, that limit is 2^14 octets. TLS 1.3
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> I don't see description of expected behaviour during session resumption.
The editor's copy says:
During renegotiation or resumption, the record size limit is
renegotiated. Records are subject to the limits that were set
> On Jan 23, 2018, at 05:06, Russ Housley wrote:
>
> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
> "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
> "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:12:30PM +1100, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,’
>
> This is the working group last call for the "Record Size Limit
> Extension for TLS" draft available at
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-record-limit/.
> Please review the document and send your comments to
On Monday, 22 January 2018 06:12:30 CET Sean Turner wrote:
> All,’
>
> This is the working group last call for the "Record Size Limit Extension for
> TLS" draft available at
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-record-limit/. Please
> review the document and send your comments to the
Hi all,
around the last IETF meeting we had a good discussion on the list
regarding application layer TLS, as proposed in
draft-friel-tls-over-http-00 and various other drafts. For the next IETF
meeting we are planning to request a BOF to have a dedicated timeslot
allocated.
For upfront