On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 08:15:44PM -0400, David Benjamin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’ve just uploaded a pair of drafts relating to signatures in TLS 1..3.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davidben-tls13-pkcs1-00
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davidben-tls-batch-signing-00
>
> The second
Regarding PKCS 1.5 in TLS 1.3, please also see slide 4 for a year 2015
version of the same motivation
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-tls-4.pdf .
On 7/29/19 5:15 PM, David Benjamin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’ve just uploaded a pair of drafts relating to signatures in TLS 1.3.
>
Hi David,
I've found some small textual issues (I'm looking at the PDF version):
In section 3.1 in step 1 (on PDF page 4):
"element 2*i+1 to a random byte of string of Hash.length bytes."
This sentence is slightly puzzling. A random bytestring?
Section 4.2, first paragraph, last sentence:
On Tuesday, 30 July 2019 17:21:05 CEST Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote:
> During the physical meeting in Montreal, we had a discussion about
> postquantum security, and in particular, on how one might want to negotiate
> several different 'groups' simultaneously (because there might not be one
>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:01 AM Ben Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:12 AM David Benjamin
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM Martin Thomson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, at 13:54, Ben Schwartz wrote:
>>> > The batch signing idea is very cool. I'm not
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:35 AM Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 08:15:44PM -0400, David Benjamin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I’ve just uploaded a pair of drafts relating to signatures in TLS 1..3.
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davidben-tls13-pkcs1-00
> >
