On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, at 14:19, David Schinazi wrote:
> Regarding Viktor's suggestion, I personally believe it would increase the
> complexity of the proposal, and I don't see use-cases compelling enough
> to warrant that complexity. I would rather keep this proposal as simple as
> possible.
I
Interested, as it happens - this is something I've been working on at Amazon.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:01 PM Sean Turner wrote:
>
> At IETF 106, we discussed forming a design team to focus on external PSK
> management and usage for TLS. The goal of this team would be to produce a
> document
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, at 14:19, David Schinazi wrote:
> > Regarding Viktor's suggestion, I personally believe it would increase the
> > complexity of the proposal, and I don't see use-cases compelling enough
> > to warrant that
At IETF 106, we discussed forming a design team to focus on external PSK
management and usage for TLS. The goal of this team would be to produce a
document that discusses considerations for using external PSKs, privacy
concerns (and possible mitigations) for stable identities, and more
LGTM
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:32 PM Christopher Wood
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> As discussed in Singapore, it's time to re-charter the working group to
> reflect ongoing (e.g., Exported Authenticators and Encrypted SNI/CH) and
> future work (e.g., cTLS). For reference, the current charter is
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:01 PM Sean Turner wrote:
> At IETF 106, we discussed forming a design team to focus on external PSK
> management and usage for TLS. The goal of this team would be to produce a
> document that discusses considerations for using external PSKs, privacy
> concerns (and
