Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

> On Jan 31, 2018, at 16:41, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > >> I also wondered whether there was any sense in reserving codepoint 0 (of >> CertificateCompressionAlgorithm) for "uncompressed". I guess not, since >> support for uncompressed certificates is implicit by means of not

[TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (5251)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7905, "ChaCha20-Poly1305 Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5251 -- Type: