[TLS] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-05

2020-10-10 Thread Al Morton via Datatracker
Reviewer: Al Morton Review result: Has Nits OPS-DIR Review of: Importing External PSKs for TLS draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-05 Note that Brian Carpenter provided a useful review for GEN-ART, far beyond general questions. Brian's comments on Section 6, Incremental Deployment, are relevant

Re: [TLS] Fwd: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-07

2020-10-10 Thread Joseph Salowey
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:14 AM Achim Kraus wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > > > To be frank, I'm actually surprised that this is even seen as a matter > for > > discussion. > > As developer, I'm surprised, that this discussion now spans a couple of > years, starting on summer 2018 with: > >

Re: [TLS] PR#28: Converting cTLS to QUIC-style varints

2020-10-10 Thread Michael D'Errico
> Hopefully https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446#section-4.2.11.2 > makes it clear why the pre_shared_key extension must be at > the end of the list. I see what was done, but it still makes me a bit sad that whatever security property was desired couldn't have been done differently to avoid this

Re: [TLS] Fwd: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-07

2020-10-10 Thread Achim Kraus
Hi Mike, > in C: > > if (complex_value_a = complex_value_b) { > // we're in trouble > } That's a pitfall of C ('=' is not '=='). You will be almost in trouble, if the complex value is not 0. But the discussion here is more about how often somethings should be adapted

Re: [TLS] Fwd: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-07

2020-10-10 Thread Michael D'Errico
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, at 17:22, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > [...] The behavior we should demand from our cryptographic > constructions is that the cryptography itself correctly returns > "valid" or "invalid" based on the input message, provided that > the application inputs the correct key material.

Re: [TLS] Fwd: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-07

2020-10-10 Thread Achim Kraus
Hi Ben, To be frank, I'm actually surprised that this is even seen as a matter for discussion. As developer, I'm surprised, that this discussion now spans a couple of years, starting on summer 2018 with: https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/8 There are many (proposed) changes since