Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
. My bad.
At that point, I could either publish a new draft version right know, or
wait a couple of days and address the last comments. I wonder what is
best for the IESG members. Any opinion?
-- Christian Huitema
On 9/17/2019 7:55 PM, Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote:
Adam Roach has entered
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
On 7/30/18 6:13 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 8:33 AM Adam Roach wrote:
This doesn't parse. Probably should say "...through the use of labels..." or
something similar.
[...]
I'm not sure what to make of this. Should it say "...private RSA keys f
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 4/4/18 1:44 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the review. You picked up on something that was a little
sloppy there.
PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit/pull/19
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote:>
Adam Roach has entered the
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 3/7/18 12:58 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> As a rule of thumb, "that" is used to start restrictive clauses
("Two doors
> are in front of you. The door that is on the right leads outside"),
while
> "which" is used to start non-restrictive clauses ("The only door in
the room,
> which is made of
On 2/6/18 9:28 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:19 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote:
Unless I missed something important, this scenario doesn't seem to make much
sense: if the client provides name A and the server replies with name B, the
client either (1)
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 5/23/17 9:33 PM, Daniel Migault wrote:
The current version does not consider that proposing the cipher suites
of the document implicitly assumes the client supports TLS1.2.
Really? Can you clarify the meaning of the following passage? Because I
can't read it in any way other than to
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
13 matches
Mail list logo
