Hello Joe,
Hello List,
with the issues https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/64 reported by
Thomas Fossati,
and the mail from Hannes Tschofenig (see
http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/draft-tschofenig-tls-dtls-rrc-00-DTLS-Return-Routability-Check-RRC-td599108.html),
I’m not sure, what the
Hi Hannes,
there was already a short discussion about that topic, see
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/64.
I also created a new issue https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/69,
because I got aware of a pitfall (record reordering with address changes) close
to that original
Great news! Thanks a lot!
May be you can spend a couple of words to explain " temporary"?
I hope, it's more about the description/entry details than the number.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Achim Kraus
Engineering Cloud Services 4 Bosch IoT Hub (INST/ECS4)
-Ursprüngliche
Hi Joe,
> request to our AD
is there an "expected date" for that requested assignment of early code-points?
I tried to find something on the IANA page, but wasn't successful.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Achim Kraus
(INST/ECS4)
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Stuttgarter
com
Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke; Geschäftsführung: Dr.
Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn, Dr. Aleksandar Mitrovic
From: Eric Rescorla
Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2018 14:44
To: Kraus Achim (INST/ECS4)
Hi List,
I put some comments and question on the github page,
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/15
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/25
and still wait for feedback and comments. FMPOV, the last changes
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/13
seems to be not
Hi,
> RFC6347, 4.1.2.7. Handling Invalid Records
> …
> In general, invalid records SHOULD be silently discarded, thus preserving the
> association;
During a handshake only the new association will be affected and therefore no
(current) association could be preserved with silently discarding
