Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Extensions and message reuse

2016-11-23 Thread Olivier Levillain
Le 22/11/2016 22:19, Eric Rescorla a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Olivier Levillain < > olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote: >> The first example of such a problem is the signature_scheme and >> signature_algorithms enums. In practice, the signature_algorithm must >> contain

Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Extensions and message reuse

2016-11-22 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Olivier Levillain < olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote: > > = Extensions and message reuse = > > We were sorry to find that some TLS 1.2 extensions were reused with a > different meaning, or that some TLS 1.3 extensions were context > dependent, which does not

[TLS] Draft 18 review : Extensions and message reuse

2016-11-22 Thread Olivier Levillain
Hi list, I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we (ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current specification. We are sorry for the multiple long messages. If the WG is interested by some of our concerns/proposals, we would be glad to propose some PRs. =