Hi,
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Olivier Levillain <
> olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote:
>
>> = Message order =
>>
>> I believe the message P.27 section 4 is important, but not
>> sufficient. As already expressed on the list, a formal automaton
>> should be provided in the spec.
>>
>>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Olivier Levillain <
olivier.levill...@ssi.gouv.fr> wrote:
>
> = Message order =
>
> I believe the message P.27 section 4 is important, but not
> sufficient. As already expressed on the list, a formal automaton
> should be provided in the spec.
>
> I think Ekr
Hi list,
I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we
(ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current
specification.
We are sorry for the multiple long messages.
If the WG is interested by some of our concerns/proposals, we would be
glad to propose some PRs.
=
