Re: [TLS] Drop "1.x" from future TLS version names?

2018-08-20 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Tony Arcieri  wrote:
> Apologies if the last thing people want to talk about right now is the next
> version of TLS.
>
> There was much discussion about bumping TLS 1.3's version number to "TLS 4"
> or thereabouts (so as to be higher than "SSLv3"). The ship has sailed on
> that and it is "TLS 1.3".
>
> I think there was widespread agreement that TLS 1.3 represented something a
> bit more substantial than a minor version bump, and a desire to have a TLS
> version number bigger than the SSL version number lest people get confused
> and deploy SSLv3 instead of TLS 1.3.
>
> Modest proposal: TLS 1.4 => TLS 4
>
> I bring this up so soon because I think a lot of the pushback regarding
> doing this before was due to changing the version so late in the development
> cycle.

I think that it's too late for that now.

>
> --
> Tony Arcieri
>
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


[TLS] Drop "1.x" from future TLS version names?

2018-08-20 Thread Tony Arcieri
Apologies if the last thing people want to talk about right now is the next
version of TLS.

There was much discussion about bumping TLS 1.3's version number to "TLS 4"
or thereabouts (so as to be higher than "SSLv3"). The ship has sailed on
that and it is "TLS 1.3".

I think there was widespread agreement that TLS 1.3 represented something a
bit more substantial than a minor version bump, and a desire to have a TLS
version number bigger than the SSL version number lest people get confused
and deploy SSLv3 instead of TLS 1.3.

Modest proposal: TLS 1.4 => TLS 4

I bring this up so soon because I think a lot of the pushback regarding
doing this before was due to changing the version so late in the
development cycle.

-- 
Tony Arcieri
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls