Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:19:58AM +0100, Olivier Levillain wrote: > Hi list, > > Le 26/01/2018 à 11:18, internet-dra...@ietf.org a écrit : > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

Hi list, Le 26/01/2018 à 11:18, internet-dra...@ietf.org a écrit : > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF. > > Title : Transport Layer Security (TLS)

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:41:34PM -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On 01/30/2018 04:02 PM, Victor Vasiliev wrote: > > I also wondered whether there was any sense in reserving codepoint > > 0 (of > > CertificateCompressionAlgorithm) for "uncompressed".  I guess not, > > since > >

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

> On Feb 5, 2018, at 13:32, Victor Vasiliev wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Sean Turner wrote: > > > > On Jan 26, 2018, at 05:26, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > > Me and Victor would like to ask for early codepoints

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

> On Jan 26, 2018, at 05:26, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > Me and Victor would like to ask for early codepoints assignment again, if you > think we are ready now. This now on the chair’s list of things to do. It’s been a week and nobody has complained so I’m thinking

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

> On Jan 31, 2018, at 16:41, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > >> I also wondered whether there was any sense in reserving codepoint 0 (of >> CertificateCompressionAlgorithm) for "uncompressed". I guess not, since >> support for uncompressed certificates is implicit by means of not

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

On 01/30/2018 04:02 PM, Victor Vasiliev wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Benjamin Kaduk > wrote: > > The new note about "no ServerHello extension to echo back" makes me > wonder if (not) echoing back in Certificate should also be

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > The new note about "no ServerHello extension to echo back" makes me > wonder if (not) echoing back in Certificate should also be mentioned, > since the TLS 1.3 paradigm is that CertificateRequest extensions are > also

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

On 01/26/2018 04:26 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a fresh new update based on the latest round of discussion. > Thanks, the changes look good. The new note about "no ServerHello extension to echo back" makes me wonder if (not) echoing back in Certificate should also be

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

Hello, Here's a fresh new update based on the latest round of discussion. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:18:21AM -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security

[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-certificate-compression-02.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF. Title : Transport Layer Security (TLS) Certificate Compression Authors : Alessandro Ghedini