Re: [TLS] -draft8447bis: rename Support Group Elliptic curve groups space

To me, it looks like we have rough agreement to change the note as specified in the PR. spt > On Mar 28, 2024, at 10:52, Sean Turner wrote: > > > > **WARNING: Potential bikeshed** > > -connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement has suggested that code points for the NIST > PQ be registered in the

Re: [TLS] -rfc8447bis: s15 ambiguity

> Hi! I submitted the following PR to address the point Rich and ekr discussed > about an ambiguity in s15 of -rfc8447bis: > https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/56 Looks good to me, thanks. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org

Re: [TLS] Dnsdir early review of draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech-01

Ted & ErikN, So it looks like ErikN submitted the following PR and ekr approved: https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech/pull/1 If we have resolved your comments, can I ask on of the authors to spin a new version and we can look to move this I-D. Also, could I kindly ask you to revise

[TLS] -rfc8447bis: s15 ambiguity

Hi! I submitted the following PR to address the point Rich and ekr discussed about an ambiguity in s15 of -rfc8447bis: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/56 Cheers, spt ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls