Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Adam Roach wrote: >>> A server MUST NOT enforce this restriction; a client might advertise a >>> higher limit that is enabled by an extension or version the server does not >>> understand. > > It would, if it were present. The IESG is reviewing

Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

On 4/4/18 1:44 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: Hi Adam, Thanks for the review. You picked up on something that was a little sloppy there. PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit/pull/19 On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Adam Roach wrote:> Adam Roach has entered the following

Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam, Thanks for the review. You picked up on something that was a little sloppy there. PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit/pull/19 On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Adam Roach wrote:> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > §4: > >> MUST NOT