> What implementation are you working on?
Proprietary, closed-source TLS stack.
> Section 5.1 says that, in TLSPlaintext, the legacy_record_version "MUST be
>ignored for all purposes".
Agree. The interop issue was definitely on my side, and I was just using it as
background for my quest
What implementation are you working on? Section 5.1 says that, in
TLSPlaintext, the legacy_record_version "MUST be ignored for all purposes".
And, of course, any pre-1.3 middleboxes which hit this case are
non-compliant. That would imply they assume they can parse messages
following a ClientHello t