On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 12:25:59PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 17:12:03 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > The EOL tracking seems to be a bit broken at the moment but I don't
> > think this is right either, it should work like emacs - when you go to
> > the end of a line, t
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 17:12:03 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> The EOL tracking seems to be a bit broken at the moment but I don't
> think this is right either, it should work like emacs - when you go to
> the end of a line, that column becomes sticky. So with:
>
> xx
> abcdef
> abc
>
> If yo
Hi
The EOL tracking seems to be a bit broken at the moment but I don't
think this is right either, it should work like emacs - when you go to
the end of a line, that column becomes sticky. So with:
xx
abcdef
abc
If you go to the second line and then press C-e to move to th end, then
press up, th
When the EOL command is used, vim tracks that the EOL is the cursor
position, not the cursor that the EOL happened to occur on for the line
where the motion was given. To keep track of this, an EOL flag is added
to indicate this state. Most motions will clear this state, but a few
such as block mod
