Re: [Tn5250j-general] Extend hotspot functionality

2005-12-13 Thread Richard Houston
Thanks muchly! I am not on that commit list but I will be shortly! Thanks again! Best regards, +--+ | Richard Houston .^. | | R.L.H. Consulting /V\ | | E-Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/( )\ | | WWW

Re: [Tn5250j-general] [Fwd: Fw: TN5250J License]

2005-12-13 Thread Kenneth Pouncey
Wim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, glad to hear those enhancements are coming into the codebase! Concerning the licensing, though, I'm not an expert myself regarding the differences. As I understand it, GPL means that any derivative or piece of code containing the libr

Re: [Tn5250j-general] [Fwd: Fw: TN5250J License]

2005-12-13 Thread Kenneth Pouncey
Matt If you are on the list now here was a personal e-mail sent to me from one of the people. I ony copied pasted a part of the e-mail as there was some personal info and do not want to get him/her in trouble. Could you maybe give some answers to the questions. I want to open this conversat

[Tn5250j-general] Bug fixed, we have a working CVS version again

2005-12-13 Thread Patrick Bielen
Hi All,   I removed Mitch Blevins's fix to get a working version again. So the "bug for the restored screen did not put the fields in the right place" is back again and we need another fix for it.   Kenneth, can you send this to Mitch to let him know his fix breaks other things in the emul

RE: [Tn5250j-general] the screen-freezing bug tracked but not sure what the problem is

2005-12-13 Thread Patrick Bielen
Hi Christian, > Because the bug appeared after your commits on 3.Nov > and tnvt.java is the only one of these files which > was changed at that time. Indeed, i thought that too, so my last fix seems to be the one that breaks it all... i will roll it back to see if that works it all out... > M

Re: [Tn5250j-general] Extend hotspot functionality

2005-12-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Kenneth Pouncey schrieb: > Richard > > I am pretty sure that Christian committed them to CVS already on the > 9th. I took a look at the committed code and it looks great. Thanks Yes, I've just been to busy to send an email yet .. (If you subscribe to the tn5250j-commits mailing list you'll see

Re: [Tn5250j-general] the screen-freezing bug tracked but not sure what the problem is

2005-12-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Patrick Bielen schrieb: > Hi All, > > Okay, so the bug is in src\org\tn5250j\framework\tn5250 > and must reside in one of the next files... > > tnvt.java > Stream5250.java > DataStreamProducer.java Ok, then I'm guessing it's: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/tn5250j/tn5250j/src/org/tn5250

RE: [Tn5250j-general] the screen-freezing bug tracked but not sure what the problem is

2005-12-13 Thread Patrick Bielen
 Hi Wim,  > I know one of our developers (Luc Gorrens) has changed a few things in there,   > also to make them correctly multithreaded. Might it be that the changes of   > sychronized blocks or procedures in there might result in deadlocks now.     Well i tracked some more... Stream5250.jav

Re: [Tn5250j-general] the screen-freezing bug tracked but not sure what the problem is

2005-12-13 Thread Wim . Van . Leuven
Hello Patrick, those files seem awkward familiar to me. I know one of our developers (Luc Gorrens) has changed a few things in there, also to make them correctly multithreaded. Might it be that the changes of sychronized blocks or procedures in there might result in deadlocks now. This could expl

[Tn5250j-general] the screen-freezing bug tracked but not sure what the problem is

2005-12-13 Thread Patrick Bielen
Hi All,   Okay, so the bug is in src\org\tn5250j\framework\tn5250 and must reside in one of the next files...   tnvt.java Stream5250.java DataStreamProducer.java   When i replace those files with the source of 0.6.0 (which is downloadable from the sf-site) then the bug disapears. So i need

RE: [Tn5250j-general] [Fwd: Fw: TN5250J License]

2005-12-13 Thread Wim . Van . Leuven
Hello all, glad to hear those enhancements are coming into the codebase! Concerning the licensing, though, I'm not an expert myself regarding the differences. As I understand it, GPL means that any derivative or piece of code containing the library, should also be opensource. LGPL lessens this c