On 6 Jun 2005 at 7:57, Andrew McDonald wrote:
> This weekend I noticed that gcc support was for 3.3! I'm using 3.4.2
> and am now deliberating what to do next. Is there something broken
> with 3.4.x? Somewhere I remember hearing about 3.4 not being so
> popular
It's more that they completely
))
)) On 6 Jun 2005 at 7:57, Andrew McDonald wrote:
))
)) > This weekend I noticed that gcc support was for 3.3! I'm using 3.4.2
)) > and am now deliberating what to do next. Is there something broken
)) > with 3.4.x? Somewhere I remember hearing about 3.4 not being so
)) > popular
))
))
