Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread List
List wrote: Hi List, I had install a fresh toaster and everything is running fine except that the incoming connections are not logged into /var/log/maillog. How can i make the connections log into the maillog file? I am running the lastest toaster with FC3. You need to use splogger instead of

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread List
List wrote: Hi List, I had install a fresh toaster and everything is running fine except that the incoming connections are not logged into /var/log/maillog. How can i make the connections log into the maillog file? I am running the lastest toaster with FC3. You need to use splogger instead of

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread David
- Original Message - From: List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: toaster@shupp.org Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 4:20 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail maillog List wrote: Hi List, I had install a fresh toaster and everything is running fine except that the incoming connections are not logged into

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread List
List wrote: Hi List, I had install a fresh toaster and everything is running fine except that the incoming connections are not logged into /var/log/maillog. How can i make the connections log into the maillog file? I am running the lastest toaster with FC3. You need to use splogger instead of

[toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread Ingo Claro
Hello all, i've encountered the following bounce from my server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TLS connect failed; connected to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. anyone knows why it happens? regards, Ingo

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
List wrote: I am using the lastest which is 0.7.9 but i dont seem to log anything to maillog. I believed vpopmail is properly configure. $ ./configure --enable-roaming-users --enable-learn-passwords --enable-domainquotas --enable-logging=v But it is still not logging. Figure out where Syslog

[toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread Pollack, David
There are a couple of things to check here. * Look in /var/log/qmail/qmail-send/current - are you seeing permissions errors for clientcert.pem and /or servercert.pem? * Make sure you have servercert.pem and clientcert.pem in /var/qmail/control, and that they are readable by the

RE: [toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread Ingo Claro
David: that was it! i get the following: 250-TLS 250-HELP 250-STARTTLS 250-DSN 250-SIZE 2048 250-8BITMIME 250 PIPELINING starttls 220 Ready to start TLS Connection closed by foreign host. the server closed the connection inmediatly after doing the starttls. So it's a problem in the other

RE: [toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread David Pollack
Cool. Quite likely, the firewall between that server the internet is not configured to allow TLS thru. Cheers, david -Original Message- From: Ingo Claro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:34 PM To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: RE: [toaster] TLS connect failed

RE: [toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread Ingo Claro
David: but isn't the communication still in port 25? What config requires the firewall? atte, Ingo Claro Gerente de Operaciones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+56-2) 43 00 155 -Mensaje original- De: David Pollack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Lunes, 04 de Abril

Re: [toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Ingo Claro wrote: David: but isn't the communication still in port 25? What config requires the firewall? Some firewalls, most notably the Cisco PIX, like to fix-up the SMTP protocol for you. And if you're not aware of it, it's a real pain ... atte, Ingo Claro Gerente de

RE: [toaster] TLS connect failed

2005-04-04 Thread Ingo Claro
Jason: ok, thanks for the aclaration. regards, Ingo Claro -Mensaje original- De: Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Lunes, 04 de Abril de 2005 13:18 Para: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] TLS connect failed Ingo Claro wrote: David:

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread List
List wrote: I am using the lastest which is 0.7.9 but i dont seem to log anything to maillog. I believed vpopmail is properly configure. $ ./configure --enable-roaming-users --enable-learn-passwords --enable-domainquotas --enable-logging=v But it is still not logging. Figure out where Syslog

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog (Solved)

2005-04-04 Thread List
- Original Message - From: List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: toaster@shupp.org Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:09 AM Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail maillog List wrote: I am using the lastest which is 0.7.9 but i dont seem to log anything to maillog. I believed vpopmail is properly configure. $

Re: [toaster] qmail maillog

2005-04-04 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Monday 04 Apr 2005 20:09, List wrote: List wrote: I am using the lastest which is 0.7.9 but i dont seem to log anything to maillog. I believed vpopmail is properly configure. $ ./configure --enable-roaming-users --enable-learn-passwords --enable-domainquotas --enable-logging=v

[toaster] Patching

2005-04-04 Thread Michael Di Martino
I know this is not the right list but my google searchs have come up empty. What is the proper syntax for patching code (software) on linux. For example I trying to patch mess833 but I havbe is the patch code.. How is that patch applied? Thanks in advance. Regards, Michael Di Martino Director

Re: [toaster] Patching

2005-04-04 Thread Rick Macdougall
Michael Di Martino wrote: I know this is not the right list but my google searchs have come up empty. What is the proper syntax for patching code (software) on linux. For example I trying to patch mess833 but I havbe is the patch code.. How is that patch applied? Thanks in advance. Regards,

Re: [toaster] Patching

2005-04-04 Thread Tom Collins
On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: patch -p0 patch.file etc You might want -p0 or -p1 depending on the patch type. You might or might not want to be in the same directory as the original files depending on the patch type. I always like to include the '--dry-run' option to patch

Re: [toaster] Patching

2005-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Tom Collins wrote: On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: patch -p0 patch.file etc You might want -p0 or -p1 depending on the patch type. You might or might not want to be in the same directory as the original files depending on the patch type. I always like to include the