Re: [toaster] updated toaster patch

2007-03-24 Thread Bill Shupp 
Bill Shupp wrote:

> I'll test signing later when I have some time to set it up.

Signing works just fine as well:

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=default; d=merchbox.com;

b=qx+1bc1baPy6zBt2CYUIXMpTpoN3307dqQIzJ/8F++3h5hf+xpj92dGGqchxq79S6w733qBSTRN1qv0OGNMtphJ3XGmmy3tKxiUNLc7JntDei26sT13xQxCgQNNZIp2A
 ;


In my outbound qmail-smtpd run file, I have this:

export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk"
export DKQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
export DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/default"

Regards,

Bill

Re: [toaster] updated toaster patch

2007-03-24 Thread Bill Shupp 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Ok, after i figured out why simscan didn't run ripmime (as usual
> permissions) i tested domainkayes and it doesn't work.
> 
> Now the real question is, i did it properly ?
> 
> I followed the libdomainkeys website instructions but the messages do not
> get signed.
> 
> Besides this anything else is working without probles except the
> libdomainkeys makefile for which Bill presented a patch allready.

I haven't tested signing on my production system, but incoming
verification works for me from the yahoo test account:

DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s512; d=yahoo.com;
b=dgLz4uWcRnL5h7vJWnd2ONjkqbBZhq0w1tIKVHysTjctE5LGiIClIMEfdyWWWO/1DJ049gt4u25ZGas8vc9bow==;

I'll test signing later when I have some time to set it up.

In my run file for this smtpd instance, I have:

export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk"
export DKQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
export DKVERIFY="DEGIJKfh"

This means that qmail-dk is run first, then hands the message off to
simscan.

Regards,

Bill

[toaster] Unsubscription request

2007-03-24 Thread David 

unsubscribe

Re: [toaster] fuzzyocr

2007-03-24 Thread Claas Langbehn 


DSPAM is intresting, but really lack of documentation is pain in the ass.

  

And it's very effective.

There is a README, there is a Wiki on the website and
I also wrote a short toaster for it: http://www.rootdir.de/qmail/


Claas

Re: [toaster] fuzzyocr

2007-03-24 Thread eero 
On la 24.3.2007 11:16, Claas Langbehn wrote:
>> Will you we considering including FuzzyOcr [1] to combat graphics
>>
> spam in your toaster?
>> Have you used it?
>>
>
> I am using dspam (dspam.nuclearelephant.com) and this type of spam is
> nearly always in my SPAM folder. And that, even though it does not look at
> the embedded graphics. :)

DSPAM is intresting, but really lack of documentation is pain in the ass.

and the fuzzyocr is not yet stable..

--
Eero

Re: [toaster] fuzzyocr

2007-03-24 Thread Claas Langbehn 
> Will you we considering including FuzzyOcr [1] to combat graphics 
spam in your toaster?

> Have you used it?

I am using dspam (dspam.nuclearelephant.com) and this type of spam is 
nearly always in my SPAM folder. And that, even though it does not look 
at the embedded graphics. :)


claas