[toaster] Weird email not being delivered
Hi, I've got a strange problem where mail is sent to an existing user, gets scanned by simscan (v1.2) and the just vanishes. qmail-smtpd logs 2008-05-23 08:39:04.032932500 tcpserver: ok 20904 newmail.axess.com:216.162.64.120:25 mail.influencecommunication.ca:66.158.143.186::32881 2008-05-23 08:39:10.455106500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote :mail.munged.ca:66.158.143.186 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-05-23 08:39:10.489383500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote :mail.munged.ca:66.158.143.186 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-05-23 08:39:10.869307500 simscan:[1]:CLEAN (-2.00/5.00):0.3771s:=?iso-8859-1?B?UmV2dWUgZGUgUHJlc3NlIGR1IDIyIG1haSAyMDA4IDogUmVt?=:66.158.143.186:: And there is nothing in the /var/log/qmail/current for that time, the message just seems to vanish. Any ideas ? Regards, Rick
Re: [toaster] Weird email not being delivered
Easy it may be a message refused because too big. qmail lacks logging these kind of events. Tonino Rick Macdougall ha scritto: Hi, I've got a strange problem where mail is sent to an existing user, gets scanned by simscan (v1.2) and the just vanishes. qmail-smtpd logs 2008-05-23 08:39:04.032932500 tcpserver: ok 20904 newmail.axess.com:216.162.64.120:25 mail.influencecommunication.ca:66.158.143.186::32881 2008-05-23 08:39:10.455106500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote :mail.munged.ca:66.158.143.186 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-05-23 08:39:10.489383500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote :mail.munged.ca:66.158.143.186 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-05-23 08:39:10.869307500 simscan:[1]:CLEAN (-2.00/5.00):0.3771s:=?iso-8859-1?B?UmV2dWUgZGUgUHJlc3NlIGR1IDIyIG1haSAyMDA4IDogUmVt?=:66.158.143.186:: And there is nothing in the /var/log/qmail/current for that time, the message just seems to vanish. Any ideas ? Regards, Rick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Interazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [toaster] authvchkpw module in courier-authlib-0.60.5
I didn't dare to install it of course, but do you have plans of creating patches for newer versions or just stick with the older one? I can't speak for Bill, but I'm hoping the next version of the toaster uses Dovecot instead of courier. A number of people on the list have successfully switched. Rick
Re: [toaster] authvchkpw module in courier-authlib-0.60.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: I didn't dare to install it of course, but do you have plans of creating patches for newer versions or just stick with the older one? I can't speak for Bill, but I'm hoping the next version of the toaster uses Dovecot instead of courier. A number of people on the list have successfully switched. Rick Hmm. Would you happen to have a decent migration tutorial for dovecot in Bill's Toaster? Maciej
Re: [toaster] authvchkpw module in courier-authlib-0.60.5
Hello, migration is described on dovecot pages http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration I migrated from courier to dovecot wo problems. 2008/5/23, Maciej Sołtysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: I didn't dare to install it of course, but do you have plans of creating patches for newer versions or just stick with the older one? I can't speak for Bill, but I'm hoping the next version of the toaster uses Dovecot instead of courier. A number of people on the list have successfully switched. Rick Hmm. Would you happen to have a decent migration tutorial for dovecot in Bill's Toaster? Maciej -- Lampa
Re: [toaster] authvchkpw module in courier-authlib-0.60.5
On May 23, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote: Hi Bill, I was thinking of potentially doing an upgrade of authlib and imap and I downloaded courier-authlib-0.60.5.tar.bz2 and saw that authvchkpw module has been removed in version 0.60.4 due to being unmaintained. I didn't dare to install it of course, but do you have plans of creating patches for newer versions or just stick with the older one? Best regards, Maciej Interesting, Sam ignored my last bugfix that I sent him afaik. And vpopmail always seemed like an annoyance, even though Inter7 hosted all the courier stuff for years, and was an early proponent of courier- imap. Maybe it's time to move on. Regards, Bill