RE: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-25 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 18:47 -0400, Andy Abshagen wrote:

Exactly right. This was discussed in a thread I started a few months
ago. The bug I found was that If spamassassin tagged the message as spam
with a score of say 5.0 and the simcontrol file has a score of 10, the
message would be bounced regardless. I found that by setting the
spamassassin score to something very high things worked fine.

Shane

 Bill,
 
 You are correct.  Changing the number in simcontrol only changes the reject 
 score not the tag score.  If you want emails to be tagged at a lower number 
 you need to setup the per user as you stated.
 
 Andy
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:45 PM
 To: toaster@shupp.org
 Subject: Re: [toaster] Spam scores required
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It exactly is (trying to make hits 5.1 for that domain):
 
  bohemiaevents.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif,spam_hits=5.1
  :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif
 
 
 Ah, I think I know what's happening.  I believe spam_hits does not
 change the spam threshhold for being marked as spam, but rather changes
 the *reject* threshold.  Perhaps someone knows for sure?  I don't have
 time to look it up.
 
 If you need custom scores for users, you should look into per-user
 preferences, like storing preferences in SQL.
 
 Bill
 



[toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread Roman Bělonohý
Hello,

after a years with Bill's toaster I have a problem :-/

An owner of one domain is complaining about spam. I wanted to lower
default required score from 2.5 to let's say 2

I added this line
bohemiaevents.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif,spam_hits=2.0

to /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and executed simscanmk.


But, received e-mails after this still contain this:

Received: (qmail 13217 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2007 19:26:33 -
Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 13210, pid: 13211, t: 3.9327s
 scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.4/m:44/d:3746 spam: 3.2.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on futura
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, *score=2.3 required=2.5* tests=AWL,BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.0


What should I do.

I am sure it works well in simscan 1.2.0 on another computer, but, maybe
I'm dumb :D

Regards,

Roman



Re: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread belonohy
Hi Bill,

nice to write to you ;-)

Unfortunately yes:

It was created by configure, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59.  Invocation command line was

  $ ./configure --enable-user=clamav --enable-clamav=y --enable-spam=y
--enable-spam-passthru=y --enable-per-domain=y --enable-ripmime
--enable-attach=y --enable-received=y
 --enable-custom-smtp-reject=y --enable-spam-hits=6
--enable-quarantinedir=/var/qmail/quarantine

Should I disable anything?

Roman

Bill Shupp napsal(a):
 Roman Bělonohý wrote:
   
 Hello,

 after a years with Bill's toaster I have a problem :-/

 An owner of one domain is complaining about spam. I wanted to lower
 default required score from 2.5 to let's say 2

 I added this line
 bohemiaevents.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif,spam_hits=2.0

 to /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and executed simscanmk.
 

 Did you compile simscan with --enable-spam-hits?  If not, then you can't
 set it in simcontrol.

 Regards,

 Bill
   


Re: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread Bill Shupp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Bill,

 nice to write to you ;-)

 Unfortunately yes:

 It was created by configure, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59.  Invocation command line was

   $ ./configure --enable-user=clamav --enable-clamav=y --enable-spam=y
 --enable-spam-passthru=y --enable-per-domain=y --enable-ripmime
 --enable-attach=y --enable-received=y
  --enable-custom-smtp-reject=y --enable-spam-hits=6
 --enable-quarantinedir=/var/qmail/quarantine

 Should I disable anything?


Make sure your custom simcontrol entry is *above* any default entry.  If
it's below it, the default will override your custom entry.  Rules are
read from the top down, just like tcp.smtp.

Regards,

Bill


Re: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread Rick Macdougall

Bill Shupp wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Bill,

nice to write to you ;-)

Unfortunately yes:

It was created by configure, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59.  Invocation command line was

  $ ./configure --enable-user=clamav --enable-clamav=y --enable-spam=y
--enable-spam-passthru=y --enable-per-domain=y --enable-ripmime
--enable-attach=y --enable-received=y
 --enable-custom-smtp-reject=y --enable-spam-hits=6
--enable-quarantinedir=/var/qmail/quarantine

Should I disable anything?



Make sure your custom simcontrol entry is *above* any default entry.  If
it's below it, the default will override your custom entry.  Rules are
read from the top down, just like tcp.smtp.

Regards,

Bill


Hi,

It doesn't work in 1.3.1, it appears to work in 1.2.

Also, the regex rules run regardless of any entries in simcontrol that 
specify regex NOT to run for a given domain or [EMAIL PROTECTED], this applies 
to 1.2 and 1.3.1


Regards,

Rick



Re: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread belonohy
It exactly is (trying to make hits 5.1 for that domain):

bohemiaevents.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif,spam_hits=5.1
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif


Bill Shupp napsal(a):
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Hi Bill,

 nice to write to you ;-)

 Unfortunately yes:

 It was created by configure, which was
 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59.  Invocation command line was

   $ ./configure --enable-user=clamav --enable-clamav=y --enable-spam=y
 --enable-spam-passthru=y --enable-per-domain=y --enable-ripmime
 --enable-attach=y --enable-received=y
  --enable-custom-smtp-reject=y --enable-spam-hits=6
 --enable-quarantinedir=/var/qmail/quarantine

 Should I disable anything?

 

 Make sure your custom simcontrol entry is *above* any default entry.  If
 it's below it, the default will override your custom entry.  Rules are
 read from the top down, just like tcp.smtp.

 Regards,

 Bill
   


Re: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread belonohy
Seems that it doesn't work in 1.2 - check my previous message to Bill.

Any idea what's going wrong? Can I debug it somehow?

Roman




 Make sure your custom simcontrol entry is *above* any default entry.  If


 Hi,

 It doesn't work in 1.3.1, it appears to work in 1.2.



RE: [toaster] Spam scores required

2007-07-24 Thread Andy Abshagen
Bill,

You are correct.  Changing the number in simcontrol only changes the reject 
score not the tag score.  If you want emails to be tagged at a lower number you 
need to setup the per user as you stated.

Andy

-Original Message-
From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:45 PM
To: toaster@shupp.org
Subject: Re: [toaster] Spam scores required

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It exactly is (trying to make hits 5.1 for that domain):

 bohemiaevents.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif,spam_hits=5.1
 :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif


Ah, I think I know what's happening.  I believe spam_hits does not
change the spam threshhold for being marked as spam, but rather changes
the *reject* threshold.  Perhaps someone knows for sure?  I don't have
time to look it up.

If you need custom scores for users, you should look into per-user
preferences, like storing preferences in SQL.

Bill