Re: [toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-12 Thread Ingo Claro

Rick Macdougall escribió:

Bill Shupp wrote:

Ingo Claro wrote:


Excuse my ignorance... but isn't dnscache = djbdns? so you just install
that instead of bind and qmail works fine?


Yes.  The patch in question actually replaces the libresolv routines in
qmail (which do the talking to the dns server), with the ones from the
djbdns package.


I think that could be a nice contribution to the toaster in the
optionals section. I can help test it if you like, don't know the setup
myself.


While it's interesting, it's very low priority for me, so I won't be
implementing it any time soon, if at all.

Regards,

Bill


I think he meant adding djbdns's dnscache program to the toaster, not 
the qmail+djbdns patch.


Or at least that's how I read it.

Might be a simple add on as an option like clam or SA at the bottom. 
I'd be willing to write that up if you want.


Regards,

Rick


I'ts exactrly what I meant! and I see you already post it, thanks!

regards,
Ingo.-



[toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-11 Thread Ingo Claro

Bill:

i've searched the list and didn't find it, so here goes the question:

is your toaster compatible with the instructions from:
 Nikola Vladov has devised a way to link qmail against djbdns 
http://qmail.chilesat.net/qmail+djbdns's resolver library.  
(http://qmail.chilesat.net/qmail+djbdns)

for linking with djbdns?

and is there really any gain in doing so?

regards,
--




*Ingo Claro F.*
Gerente de Operaciones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(+56-2) 43 00 155



Certificado ISO 9001:2000



Re: [toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-11 Thread Bill Shupp
Ingo Claro wrote:
 Bill:
 
 i've searched the list and didn't find it, so here goes the question:
 
 is your toaster compatible with the instructions from:
 Nikola Vladov has devised a way to link qmail against djbdns
 http://qmail.chilesat.net/qmail+djbdns's resolver library. 
 (http://qmail.chilesat.net/qmail+djbdns)
 for linking with djbdns?
 
 and is there really any gain in doing so?

Perhaps, I've never tried to use it.  I just use dnscache, and
everything works great.  :)  Besides, qmail itself is rarely the
bottleneck for me these days.  It's usually scanners, etc.  You probably
wouldn't need such a thing until you were scaling very high, where the
mta itself was the bottleneck.

Bill


Re: [toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-11 Thread Ingo Claro

Bill Shupp escribió:

Ingo Claro wrote:
  

Bill:

i've searched the list and didn't find it, so here goes the question:

is your toaster compatible with the instructions from:


Nikola Vladov has devised a way to link qmail against djbdns

http://qmail.chilesat.net/qmail+djbdns's resolver library. 
(http://qmail.chilesat.net/qmail+djbdns)

for linking with djbdns?

and is there really any gain in doing so?



Perhaps, I've never tried to use it.  I just use dnscache, and
everything works great.  :)  Besides, qmail itself is rarely the
bottleneck for me these days.  It's usually scanners, etc.  You probably
wouldn't need such a thing until you were scaling very high, where the
mta itself was the bottleneck.

Bill
  
Excuse my ignorance... but isn't dnscache = djbdns? so you just install 
that instead of bind and qmail works fine?
I think that could be a nice contribution to the toaster in the 
optionals section. I can help test it if you like, don't know the setup 
myself.


regards,
Ingo.-



Re: [toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-11 Thread Bill Shupp
Ingo Claro wrote:

 Excuse my ignorance... but isn't dnscache = djbdns? so you just install
 that instead of bind and qmail works fine?

Yes.  The patch in question actually replaces the libresolv routines in
qmail (which do the talking to the dns server), with the ones from the
djbdns package.

 I think that could be a nice contribution to the toaster in the
 optionals section. I can help test it if you like, don't know the setup
 myself.

While it's interesting, it's very low priority for me, so I won't be
implementing it any time soon, if at all.

Regards,

Bill


Re: [toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-11 Thread Rick Macdougall

Bill Shupp wrote:

Ingo Claro wrote:


Excuse my ignorance... but isn't dnscache = djbdns? so you just install
that instead of bind and qmail works fine?


Yes.  The patch in question actually replaces the libresolv routines in
qmail (which do the talking to the dns server), with the ones from the
djbdns package.


I think that could be a nice contribution to the toaster in the
optionals section. I can help test it if you like, don't know the setup
myself.


While it's interesting, it's very low priority for me, so I won't be
implementing it any time soon, if at all.

Regards,

Bill


I think he meant adding djbdns's dnscache program to the toaster, not 
the qmail+djbdns patch.


Or at least that's how I read it.

Might be a simple add on as an option like clam or SA at the bottom. I'd 
be willing to write that up if you want.


Regards,

Rick



Re: [toaster] linking with djbdns

2006-04-11 Thread Bill Shupp
Rick Macdougall wrote:
 Bill Shupp wrote:
 Ingo Claro wrote:

 Excuse my ignorance... but isn't dnscache = djbdns? so you just install
 that instead of bind and qmail works fine?

 Yes.  The patch in question actually replaces the libresolv routines in
 qmail (which do the talking to the dns server), with the ones from the
 djbdns package.

 I think that could be a nice contribution to the toaster in the
 optionals section. I can help test it if you like, don't know the setup
 myself.

 While it's interesting, it's very low priority for me, so I won't be
 implementing it any time soon, if at all.

 Regards,

 Bill
 
 I think he meant adding djbdns's dnscache program to the toaster, not
 the qmail+djbdns patch.
 
 Or at least that's how I read it.

Ah, you're probably right.

 Might be a simple add on as an option like clam or SA at the bottom. I'd
 be willing to write that up if you want.

Sure, I should probably add that anyway.

Regards,

Bill