On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 03:19:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vicent, Forrest,
Thanks for the patch review.
Could you summarize and/or expand a bit :-) ?
The changes I made affect two uses of the concept of Character encodings:
1 what's being sent to the browser (ie in
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Vincent Schonau wrote:
[this has also been entered as bug #1808]
Both Tomcat and Apache have the string '8859_1' hard-coded and as a public
^typo: I meant Jasper
static final String in several places.
Just to clarify; this all
-Original Message-
From: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 12:01 AM
(sorry for the response lag, unfortunatly I don't read tomcat very
frequently)
...
* Using XSTL for templating...
Like Jon and some others, I think that XSTL is
Hi!
In my beta 5 of Tomcat was no StandardClassLoader compiled in the
catalina.jar file in org/apache/catalina/loader/ .perhaps its an
incomplete unzip but perhaps the built was not complete... Who can tell
me ?? Please write backThank you all!
nacho 01/05/20 13:27:21
Modified:src/etc/jk wrapper.properties
Log:
Adapting to new jar structure
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +7 -15 jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/jk/wrapper.properties
Index: wrapper.properties
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:51 PM
kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for apache 1.3, i'd think you'd want to use apr without threads. but i
could be wrong...
for what it's worth, a while ago i tried using a multithreaded library
in
There is a lingering bug in (at least) Sun's JDK
that causes SimpleDateFormat to occasionaly throw a
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException instead of a
ParseException.
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4212077.html
(Requires a cookie; thanks, Sun)
Some rogue client out there is
danmil 01/05/20 15:57:57
Modified:jk/src/doc AJPv13.html
Log:
Specified encoding for Null strings.
Submitted by Ted Eiles [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/src/doc/AJPv13.html
Index: AJPv13.html
Costin:
I'm not yet familiar with the Tomcat or Jasper code (and I've only
been on this list for a couple weeks) but in general I concur with
Vince's analysis. I can corroborate his benchmark testing since
I've seen it contribute to performance problems under very heavy
load with a large
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81
*** shadow/81 Sun May 20 17:18:24 2001
--- shadow/81.tmp.23909 Sun May 20 19:14:31 2001
***
*** 1,17
! Bug#: 81
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 3.2
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
! Severity: Normal
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=395
*** shadow/395 Sun May 20 17:20:08 2001
--- shadow/395.tmp.23942Sun May 20 19:16:59 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 395
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 3.2
! Platform: All
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251
*** shadow/251 Sun May 20 17:19:22 2001
--- shadow/251.tmp.23930Sun May 20 19:15:56 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 251
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 2.3 beta 7
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=437
*** shadow/437 Sun May 20 17:20:21 2001
--- shadow/437.tmp.23948Sun May 20 19:17:39 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 437
! Product: SAPI
! Version: Tomcat 3.2.1
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101
*** shadow/101 Sun May 20 17:18:33 2001
--- shadow/101.tmp.23918Sun May 20 19:15:04 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 101
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 3.1
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
! Severity:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258
*** shadow/258 Sun May 20 17:19:24 2001
--- shadow/258.tmp.23936Sun May 20 19:16:32 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 258
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 3.1
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
! Severity:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243
*** shadow/243 Sun May 20 17:19:19 2001
--- shadow/243.tmp.23924Sun May 20 19:15:30 2001
***
*** 1,22
! Bug#: 243
! Product: SAPI
! Version: SERVLET_2_3_JSP_
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=459
*** shadow/459 Sun May 20 17:20:28 2001
--- shadow/459.tmp.23955Sun May 20 19:18:04 2001
***
*** 1,18
! Bug#: 459
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 4.0.b1
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=460
*** shadow/460 Sun May 20 17:20:28 2001
--- shadow/460.tmp.23961Sun May 20 19:18:30 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 460
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 4.0.b1
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=461
*** shadow/461 Sun May 20 17:20:28 2001
--- shadow/461.tmp.23967Sun May 20 19:18:55 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 461
! Product: SAPI
! Version: 4.0.b1
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278
*** shadow/278 Sun May 20 17:19:30 2001
--- shadow/278.tmp.24085Sun May 20 19:40:58 2001
***
*** 1,17
! Bug#: 278
! Product: Watchdog
! Version: November 29th bu
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=470
*** shadow/470 Sun May 20 17:20:31 2001
--- shadow/470.tmp.24109Sun May 20 19:42:44 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 470
! Product: Watchdog
! Version: 20010110
! Platform: HP
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279
*** shadow/279 Sun May 20 17:19:30 2001
--- shadow/279.tmp.24094Sun May 20 19:41:45 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 279
! Product: Watchdog
! Version: Watchdog 3.x
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
*** shadow/128 Sun May 20 17:18:42 2001
--- shadow/128.tmp.24005Sun May 20 19:34:59 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 128
! Product: slide
! Version: slide
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259
*** shadow/259 Sun May 20 17:19:24 2001
--- shadow/259.tmp.24075Sun May 20 19:39:05 2001
***
*** 1,22
! Bug#: 259
! Product: jasper
! Version: 1.3.2-b8
! Platform:
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
!
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469
*** shadow/469 Sun May 20 17:20:31 2001
--- shadow/469.tmp.24103Sun May 20 19:42:11 2001
***
*** 1,19
! Bug#: 469
! Product: Watchdog
! Version: 20010110
! Platform: HP
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
UTF Unicode Transfer Fromat can be many different lengths.
UTF-8 uses 8 bit bytes to encode ISO-10646 code points. When the code point
value is less than 65,768 (i.e. UNICODE) then UTF-8 will use up to 3 bytes
(24 bits) to encode the code point. However, when the code point value is
from the
costin 01/05/20 20:44:37
Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteBuffer.java
CharBuffer.java
Log:
The byte and char buffer part of OutputBuffer.
Moved here ( without changing any API in OutputBuffer ) to avoid duplication
of code, the code
costin 01/05/20 20:46:30
Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf C2BConverter.java
Log:
This is a very important performance stuff - it has been extracted
from OutputBuffer for general use. It'll be used in the encoder, to
avoid the _huge_ overhead of creating one-time
costin 01/05/20 20:49:48
Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf Encoder.java
Log:
Encoder - this is the url encoder, missing in 3.3 and needed to
fix but #210 ( the most votes so far ).
A lot of work has been put into avoiding any garbage ( the Writers
and encoders
costin 01/05/20 21:04:09
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core OutputBuffer.java
Log:
Small refactoring, the API is unchanged but the char-byte encoder
and the buffers have been moved in util/buf and are now used for the
url encoder.
The benefit here is cleaner code (
Tim,
Thanks, great for the extra information.
One small corection - while the java chars are 16 bit, they can ( AFAIK
) represent the full 21 bits of unicode ( or 31 for iso-??? ). That's the
use of the surrogate chars ( d800 .. dbff if I got it right ), used to
combine 2 chars.
The %
costin 01/05/20 21:22:33
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/aaa
AccessInterceptor.java
src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Http10.java
Log:
Removed the unescaping - to fix double escaping problems, and as a first
step in
costin 01/05/20 21:27:54
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp12.java
Log:
Added an extra flush()
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +0 -1
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server/Ajp12.java
Index: Ajp12.java
costin 01/05/20 21:44:25
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Main.java
Log:
Use File.separator. It's an old bug, don't remember the number.
( has been on my computer for a while )
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +16 -10
Hi everybody,
I'm working on a website where some pages
are to be kept in https and some on http.But when we transfer from https to
http, session is not transferred in Netscape.It's working fine in IE.We are
using tomcat. Is there anything i should do with tomcat
Perhaps the in memory session cookie doesn't get sent for the other path so
have you tried using url rewriting instead?
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Raina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Transferring session between
costin 01/05/20 22:13:11
Modified:src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade JspInterceptor.java
Log:
A small change in JspInterceptor, to reduce the configuration pains.
We'll check if jikes is available and used it - many people find
editing configuration files harder than
Well of course I don't know that this is the reason I'm simply guessing. But
yes using response.encodeURL for all your urls so that the session id gets
included. When you try this turn cookie support off on both browsers and see
if you get consistent results on the server side.
Maybe IE. doesn't
Marc Saegesser wrote:
The null check is simple enough and its already been tested in 3.3
so I feel comfortable making the change without a beta. I'll commit
the change today.
Great, thanks!
Another question regarding using the security manager and JSP. If
I use the default
39 matches
Mail list logo
