DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7759] New: - Reload an existing Application : KO

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7759. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c,jk_util.c

2002-04-05 Thread Bernd Koecke
Hi, some days ago I sent a question for an only routing lb-worker. Costin asked for the patch and here it is. I added two config-directives for the lb-worker: local_worker - this is the name of the worker which should get the request if there is no session or no jvmRoute. fault_action - the

RE: [PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c,jk_util.c

2002-04-05 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Seems a good patch. Should be commited. BTW, Bernd could you make a little documentation which could be included in jk doc and add example ? Excellent works ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4668] - File download over http corrupt

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c,jk_util.c

2002-04-05 Thread Bernd Koecke
GOMEZ Henri wrote: Seems a good patch. Should be commited. BTW, Bernd could you make a little documentation which could be included in jk doc and add example ? Excellent works ;) Thanks, I'll have a look at the docs in detail and add some example. Should I sent these files to this

RE: [PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c,jk_util.c

2002-04-05 Thread GOMEZ Henri
BTW, Bernd could you make a little documentation which could be included in jk doc and add example ? Excellent works ;) Thanks, I'll have a look at the docs in detail and add some example. Should I sent these files to this list? Yes, please ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4668] - File download over http corrupt

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7762] New: - stdout logfile handling

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7762. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7759] - Reload an existing Application : KO

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7759. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 05:37:39 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java Log: - Fix the build (remove TC 3.3 imports + implement missing method). Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -4

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-4.0

2002-04-05 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-05/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.html Buildfile: build.xml deploy-prepare: deploy-static: deploy:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
costin 02/04/04 14:34:46 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: Moved the parseHost method from coyote. That's another step in merging the connector code and sharing a single codebase. The Host:

Re: Coyote: replacing Processor with ProtocolHandler

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, In order to merge the connector-related code in Coyote and jk, I need a different abstraction. Processor takes InputStream/OutputStream params, and assumes the connector will listen on the port, etc. The problem is that it doesn't map to things like JNI and is hard to abstract things

Re: Coyote: replacing Processor with ProtocolHandler

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: It's easy to implement it in http11 - this is duplicated in the 33/40 versions. I would prefer to use the 33 thread pool from util, but I'm ok with the code used in 40 ( or I can implement both, with an option ). The 4.0 pool works good,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote ProtocolHandler.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 07:52:45 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote ProtocolHandler.java Log: - Coding style :) Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +19 -8 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/ProtocolHandler.java Index: ProtocolHandler.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 07:53:09 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: - Coding style :) Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +7 -4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7770] New: - NPE in at session creation shortly after starting tomcat 3.3.1

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7770. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7771] New: - [PATCH] HttpServletResponse.encodeURL and encodeRedirectURL appends link anchor before query string.

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7771] - [PATCH] HttpServletResponse.encodeURL and encodeRedirectURL appends link anchor before query string.

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7772] - Redirect failed after changing an image

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7772. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7772] New: - Redirect failed after changing an image

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7772. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 09:01:01 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java Log: - It looks like the anchor part should be appended after the query part in the URI. Section 4 and 5.2 of RFC 2396. - Thanks to Kare Nuorteva kare at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7771] - [PATCH] HttpServletResponse.encodeURL and encodeRedirectURL appends link anchor before query string.

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Coyote: replacing Processor with ProtocolHandler

2002-04-05 Thread costinm
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: There is no problem if we use 2 Http11Protocol, one with ThreadPool the other with 4.0 threads. Right now I'm working on the TP one. We don't need two, so I'll try yours ;-) Do you plan to write the Http11ProtocolHandler ? Already done, but I

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 09:25:26 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java Log: - Port patch. - It looks like the anchor part should be appended after the query part in the URI. Section 4 and 5.2 of RFC 2396. - Thanks

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 09:26:25 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector Tag: tomcat_40_branch HttpResponseBase.java Log: - Port patch. - It looks like the anchor part should be appended after the query part in the URI. Section 4 and 5.2 of

Re: Coyote: replacing Processor with ProtocolHandler

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: There is no problem if we use 2 Http11Protocol, one with ThreadPool the other with 4.0 threads. Right now I'm working on the TP one. We don't need two, so I'll try yours ;-) Do you plan to write the Http11ProtocolHandler ? Already done,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net - New directory

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 09:40:48 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net - New directory -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

why doesnt auto discovery of uri's from tld not work in tomcat 4.0.4

2002-04-05 Thread f f
Hi The jsp spec 1.2 says that All i need to do is drop tld files in web-inf folder or subdirectory OR drop tlds packaged in jars in web-inf/lib folder and I can use the uri (in these tld files ) in my jsp like %@ taglib uri=myuri prefix... % but the implementation of 4.03 doesnt support

webapp_bug

2002-04-05 Thread Zadravec Janos
Hi! I have a big problem, i think it we found a bug in apache-tomcat mod_webapp connector. I attached the example servlet. The client gets the first byte from DumpServlet only after all have been written AND doGet (doPost) of DumpServlet returned. Seems to be a bug in the connector (it works

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util build.xml

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 09:45:08 Modified:util build.xml Log: Add detection script for JSSE and PureTLS ( cutpaste from tomcat ). For PureTLS - I think it would be usefull to not require it in classpath, but that's who it is right now in 33. Revision ChangesPath 1.4

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 09:48:27 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: Added some comments with the code that will have to be added to pass up the SSL information. This info shouldn't be extracted unless the user

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Protocol.java

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 09:50:39 Added: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Protocol.java Log: Initial implementation of http11 'protocolHandler' The SSL stuff is not completely plugged in, and it will require a recompilation of util ( so you have the util.net

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7700] - [PATCH] Anchors don't work when session tracking is handled by URL rewrite

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7700. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7771] - [PATCH] HttpServletResponse.encodeURL and encodeRedirectURL appends link anchor before query string.

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Node.java

2002-04-05 Thread kinman
kinman 02/04/05 10:40:50 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Node.java Log: - Fixed some typo and obvious bugs. - Reverted codes to init JspAttrs in Node.CustomTag: not the right place for it. Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7771] - [PATCH] HttpServletResponse.encodeURL and encodeRedirectURL appends link anchor before query string.

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7700] - [PATCH] Anchors don't work when session tracking is handled by URL rewrite

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7700. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3 CoyoteInterceptor2.java Tomcat3Adapter.java Tomcat3Request.java Tomcat3Response.java

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 10:42:03 Added: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3 CoyoteInterceptor2.java Tomcat3Adapter.java Tomcat3Request.java Tomcat3Response.java Log: Initial ( and incomplete ) refactoring to use ProtocolHandler and

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 10:42:51 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java Log: - Revert patch. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +5 -5

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 10:43:12 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java Log: - Revert patch. Revision ChangesPath 1.54 +5 -5

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 10:44:21 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector Tag: tomcat_40_branch HttpResponseBase.java Log: - Revert patch. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote build.xml

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 11:11:05 Modified:.build.xml coyote build.xml Log: Few small fixes. I build all the stuff in one jar for easier testing. I'm also experimenting with the order and with removing util from 3.3. Revision ChangesPath 1.2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk build.xml

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 11:11:42 Modified:jk build.xml Log: Build ordering Revision ChangesPath 1.31 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 11:13:56 Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c Log: Added a pre-defined serverRoot variable, to resolve paths. Right now the best way is to not use relative paths, but ${serverRoot}/logs/... or ${serverRoot}/conf/jk2.properties. Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Node.java

2002-04-05 Thread kinman
kinman 02/04/05 12:27:30 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Node.java Log: - Add visitBody to visit(JspText) for the default visitor, because jsp:text has a body. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +4 -3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7778] New: - mod_webapp does not set 'Content-Type: text/html' when reporting a compiler error

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7778. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7778] - mod_webapp does not set 'Content-Type: text/html' when reporting a compiler error

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7778. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6468] - content-type not set for errors

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6468. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3 CoyoteInterceptor2.java Tomcat3Request.java Tomcat3Response.java

2002-04-05 Thread costin
costin 02/04/05 14:17:49 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3 CoyoteInterceptor2.java Tomcat3Request.java Tomcat3Response.java Log: One more step. The only remaining problem is implementing callbacks to the

CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread costinm
2 questions ( for Remy ): - is anyone using the getSocket() method in CoyoteRequest ? It's obvious this can't work for other protocols, and extracting SSL info is specific to the SSL impl and should be done at the protocol layer. - Any reason for not extending HttpBaseRequest ? Costin --

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
2 questions ( for Remy ): - is anyone using the getSocket() method in CoyoteRequest ? It's obvious this can't work for other protocols, and extracting SSL info is specific to the SSL impl and should be done at the protocol layer. Some valves in the Catalina pipeline use that. It probably

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread costinm
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: Some valves in the Catalina pipeline use that. It probably should be done at the protocol layer, but I can't do that for compatibility reasons, so I think the socket should be set as a note in the Request object (as is suggested in the commented

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 352] - xsl.apply xsl.import Absolute (external) URLs BugRat Report#632

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 331] - Support for parametric XSL in xsl-taglib BugRat Report#597

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=331. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 349] - Suport for relative URLS in XSL taglib BugRat Report#627

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=349. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[FAQ] jGuru FAQ Update

2002-04-05 Thread Alex Chaffee
jGuru maintains FAQs and Forums on Servlets, JSP, and Tomcat (as well as many other Java topics). Here is an automated update on recent postings to Tomcat-related FAQs. Please direct flames and feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . - Alex

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: Some valves in the Catalina pipeline use that. It probably should be done at the protocol layer, but I can't do that for compatibility reasons, so I think the socket should be set as a note in the Request object (as is suggested in the

Re: CoyoteRequest: the socket

2002-04-05 Thread Eric Rescorla
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: I have big doubts the code that calls getSocket() can even work with ajp or pureTLS or other things. Probably a good idea to find where it is and call the right thing ( like getAttribute for certs, etc ).

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteRequest.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 19:06:32 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteRequest.java Log: - Fix an off-by-one bug in the construction of the request dispatcher path. Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +5 -5

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 19:06:52 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java Log: - Fix an off-by-one bug in the construction of the request dispatcher path. Revision ChangesPath 1.37 +5 -5

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java

2002-04-05 Thread remm
remm02/04/05 19:07:03 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector Tag: tomcat_40_branch HttpRequestBase.java Log: - Fix an off-by-one bug in the construction of the request dispatcher path. Revision ChangesPath No

Timestamps in catalina.out?

2002-04-05 Thread Alfred Lew
Is there a way to append a timestamp to the entries within catalina.out? I see where you can specify timestamp=true in server.xml (below), but that goes to another log. Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=apache_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Thanks. -- Alfred

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7785] New: - tomcat bug in context reloading

2002-04-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7785. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.