tomcat 4.1.9 rpms available

2002-08-22 Thread Henri Gomez
The TC 4.1.9 beta rpms are available : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.9-beta/rpms/ Nota that we share now the rpms with the jpackage project (www.jpackage.org), so for those of you who want to rebuild source rpms, you should go to jpackage site to get the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11919] New: - Can't create servlet-mapping of / (not /*)

2002-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11919. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: tomcat 4.1.9 rpms available

2002-08-22 Thread Bojan Smojver
Legend! Bojan On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 18:37, Henri Gomez wrote: The TC 4.1.9 beta rpms are available : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.9-beta/rpms/ Nota that we share now the rpms with the jpackage project (www.jpackage.org), so for those of you who want

RE: Jasper 2 class files

2002-08-22 Thread John Trollinger
This would be an easy change to JspC so that you could have a flag that would generate package names instead of using the standard package name. If there is any interest in this let me know.. -Original Message- From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11929] New: - JDBC Realm rejects user at first login

2002-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11929. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

AJP13,Tomcat404 and SSL

2002-08-22 Thread Gernot Lepuschitz
As i mentioned last time, i´m writing an AJP Client for our server. Now that ajp13 supports ssl, I want to implement it, too. But I don´t really understant how this will work. I first thought about an Inet-socket-ssl connection to Tomcat where the whole AJP Request will be ssl encrypted. But

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11931] New: - incorrect parsing inside jsp:include

2002-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11933] New: - every time u go to the server u get the default incoding

2002-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11933. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11934] New: - web.xml security-constraint is parsed incorrectly

2002-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11934. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: AJP13,Tomcat404 and SSL

2002-08-22 Thread Kevin Seguin
the ajp13 protocol does not support ssl. the isssl flag you are refering to is probably the ajp request attribute that indicates whether or not the request to the web server was using https. -Original Message- From: Gernot Lepuschitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

Re: AJP13,Tomcat404 and SSL

2002-08-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Quoting Gernot Lepuschitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As i mentioned last time, i´m writing an AJP Client for our server. Now that ajp13 supports ssl, I want to implement it, too. But I don´t really understant how this will work. ajp13 supports SSL ATTRIBUTES, but don't make use of SSL, so it's not

need examples for mod_jk/mod_jk2 conf and properties

2002-08-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, I'll need examples files for mod_jk 1.2.0 and 2.0.0beta for the tomcat-connectors rpm I'm working on. mod_jk 1.2.0 is well know but there is new features like failover only mode in Load-Balancing (don't remember the exact synthax). Also we need to comment the new JkOption