DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14405.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Replying to an older version of the thread, since I share messages the other
way around.
Personally, I think that Remy needs to work on his people skills. Keith has
been a very valuable committer on the 3.3 branch. Rather than shooting him
down, you could have given him pointers on how to
Bill Barker wrote:
Replying to an older version of the thread, since I share messages the
other
way around.
Personally, I think that Remy needs to work on his people skills.
Keith has
been a very valuable committer on the 3.3 branch. Rather than
shooting him
down, you could have given him
As I believe enforcing the protocol should be the responsability of the
protocol handler, I have done (and will commit soon) a change which
delegates setting the special headers (including content-language and
content-type) to the protocol handler. I will commit the change soon.
The cause of
For a clean tomcat install i download a clean tomcat-4.1.14-LE-jdk14 binary,
configure it like the howto said it. After starting tomcat i run nmap on my
machine.
Here the output of catalina run and nmap:
-- catalina
Using CATALINA_BASE:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14302.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/11/09 09:12:05
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Response.java
Log:
- Refactor special header handling.
- The special headers are now set in the protocol handler, which allows enforcing
the protocol (as it is not possible to remove headers from the
remm2002/11/09 09:12:17
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Refactor special header handling.
- The special headers are now set in the protocol handler, which allows enforcing
the protocol (as it is not
Getting discussions going in this list is like forcing water uphills.
I've tried for a while now to get involved in sorting out problems that
I've encountered. However it is quite hard when the patches I've
attempted to make are dismissed without any kind of reasoning or
discussion.
Further I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14413.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14281.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14416.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2002/11/09 23:25:21
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
This time, without the tabs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +12 -12
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/JkCoyoteHandler.java
Index:
13 matches
Mail list logo