DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/07/22 21:02:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
MapperListener.java
Log:
When using the embedded interface (or jmx directly), context are never removed because of this condition (mapper.removeContext
remm2003/07/23 00:51:33
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationDispatcher.java
Log:
- Forgot a few logging calls.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +2 -2
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
It isn't quite that easy. On Solaris the args for
gethostbyname_r are different than on the AS400.
Arg, you're right, same thing on Linux
may be the configure task should get some discover
code from apr (cf apr_network.m4 from APR).
Or maybe we should delegate it to
All,
I'm new in this mailing list and I've seen a problem with a Tomcat Memory Leak
which seems to be similar with the bug 20758
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758 but I would like to be sure
about that...
I have several J2EE applications hosted by my Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21823.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
It isn't quite that easy. On Solaris the args for
gethostbyname_r are different than on the AS400.
Arg, you're right, same thing on Linux
may be the configure task should get some discover
code from apr (cf apr_network.m4 from APR).
When you build
remm2003/07/23 06:31:59
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardPipeline.java
Log:
- Valves should only be registered and unregistered when:
- addValve or removeValve is called and the associated pipeline is started
- on start
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/07/22 21:02:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
MapperListener.java
Log:
When using the embedded interface (or jmx directly), context are
never removed because of this
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
BTW, I don't see why the spec saying that the header is optional implies
that the flag must be implemented as something optional. It merely means
that an implementation may ignore completely this feature.
Actually, the Servlet spec is going to say
Hi,
is Tomcat planning to provide a tag file compiler, which would compile
tag files developed outside the web application, into a tag library?
Secion JSP.8.4.4 of the JSP 2.0 spec says that this should be possible.
Thanks
Petr
When you build mod_jk for apache 2 _REENTRANT will be defined if
it is needed by apache. A simple #ifdef will work.
I already did this but when I tested it caused other problems.
I haven't had a chance yet to go back and fully test and debug
this change. I'll get to it this week.
Or maybe we
Henri Gomez wrote:
When you build mod_jk for apache 2 _REENTRANT will be defined if
it is needed by apache. A simple #ifdef will work. I already did this
but when I tested it caused other problems.
I haven't had a chance yet to go back and fully test and debug
this change. I'll get to it this
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
When you build mod_jk for apache 2 _REENTRANT will be defined if
it is needed by apache. A simple #ifdef will work. I already did
this but when I tested it caused other problems.
I haven't had a chance yet to go back and fully test and debug
this
So the idea will be to use APR implementation when we detect that APR
is available (configure should be updated accordingly).
And under Apache 2.0, APR is allways available !
Apache 1.3 use fork mode under Unix, so no thread problem.
For Windows I wonder what happen, may be the implementation
Currently, if webapp developers do not want to expose the source of
their JSP files, they have to precompile them and add a servlet
mapping for each JSP to their web.xml (e.g., with the help of jspc).
If the webapp contains a large number of JSPs, the web.xml is going to
grow pretty big.
Would it
How will phantom pages be addressed? Pages where the jsp once existed but
then was deleted, but the corresponding class was not deleted?
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Jan Luehe wrote:
Currently, if webapp developers do not want to expose the source of
their JSP files, they have to precompile them and add a servlet
mapping for each JSP to their web.xml (e.g., with the help of jspc).
If the webapp contains a large number of JSPs, the web.xml is going to
grow
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfarcand2003/07/23 10:44:37
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
MapperListener.java
Log:
Better solution for the undeployment problem. the engineName is always null when
undeploying an application.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10
Remy,
So I guess we have no choice but make it configurable (or not support
it at all, which I don't think is an option), but since you've agreed
that we should make this a configurable option (provided it is added
at the right places), this is no longer an issue.
I just committed a revised impl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tim Funk wrote:
How will phantom pages be addressed? Pages where the jsp once existed
but then was deleted, but the corresponding class was not deleted?
That's why I suggested an option for JspServlet that would disable this
optimization and require a servlet mapping for each precompiled JSP.
Jan Luehe wrote:
one comment, though: By adding the xpoweredBy property to
CoyoteConnector instead of Host/Context, we get the
X-Powered-By: Servlet/2.4
response header even for static resources. You could argue that this is
OK, since static resources are handled by the DefaultServlet, but
Jan Luehe wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
How will phantom pages be addressed? Pages where the jsp once existed
but then was deleted, but the corresponding class was not deleted?
That's why I suggested an option for JspServlet that would disable this
optimization and require a servlet mapping for each
remm2003/07/23 11:31:05
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Add the optional JAR in the embed package.
Revision ChangesPath
1.145 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
Arg, what a hack ;-) (and my definition is that we get into the servlet
container; if it's an internal servlet, it seems good enough, and the
page being served was served by a Servlet API 2.4 component)
Come on, this is a stupid feature nobody but marketting cares about (and
I'd say the said
luehe 2003/07/23 12:23:46
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java
PageInfo.java
Log:
Preparation work for new 'static include' rules
Revision ChangesPath
1.77 +5 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21834.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21834.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Under User Definition in the /admin application, the Users,
Groups, and Roles functionality does not work with the JNDIRealm.
While troubleshooting this, I found that the real cause of the problem
was being hidden by a programming error -- an error response was being
sent, but the code did not
luehe 2003/07/23 13:37:24
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler PageInfo.java
Validator.java
Log:
Ignore default settings for extends and language when checking for
multiple page directive attributes with conflicting values
Revision
I don't think this is correct anymore since we use ant, should I remove the
following from RELEASE-NOTES?
JAVAC leaking memory:
The Java compiler leaks memory each time a class is compiled. Web applications
containing hundreds of JSP files may as a
luehe 2003/07/23 18:17:34
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TagLibraryInfoImpl.java
Log:
Do not unconditionally use JSP as the default body-content type,
because it is illegal for SimpleTag handlers
Revision ChangesPath
mod_jk2 allows for AF_UNIX connections to talk to Tomcat4.
(http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc/jk2/conf
igwebex.html)
So lets say we specify /tmp/jk2.socket as the AF_UNIX file socket for
communication
between mod_jk2 and Tomcat4. We can tell mod_jk2 in the
Tomcat doesn't adhere to the (new) requirements in the 2.4 Servlet-Spec for
handling the case of Overlapping Constraints:
spec-quote version=2.4 pfd3 section=12.8.1
When a url-pattern and http-method pair occurs in multiple security
constraints, the
applicable constraints (on the pattern and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21843.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
42 matches
Mail list logo
