-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In case of single child mpm, nothing.
On others, jkstatus at least.
Also, we adopted the APR as mandatory, so, all platform
specific code except
JNI has to go out (sooner or later).
MT.
That is fine, assuming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In case of single child mpm, nothing.
On others, jkstatus at least.
Also, we adopted the APR as mandatory, so, all platform
specific code except
JNI has to go out (sooner or later).
MT.
That is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming that the next mod_jk2 release wants to go with the
present APR
(0.94) or even the CVS (pre 1.0?) then we need to kludge
mod_jk on solaris 8 (at least) to not use APR for this bit.
No it's gonna be 0.95 (the one
Jan Luehe wrote:
This is a bug. The String[] returned by req.getParameterValues() should
have been a clone.
I just committed a fix.
I'd like to point out that this bug is not worth any performance drop.
You should move those clones to the case where there's a security manager.
Rémy
Now if they buck the trend and provide accurate answers to problems with
their products I know I would be inclined to purchase from Corel.
-Martin Gainty
- Original Message -
From: Customer Service(custserv) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:29 PM
remm2004/03/02 04:31:57
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
StandardClassLoader.java WebappLoader.java
mbeans-descriptors.xml
Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
remm2004/03/02 04:32:08
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
Bootstrap.java
Log:
- Register all classloaders with JMX, so that Tomcat is actually manageable
through JMX remote (otherwise, instantiating a new MBean is not possible).
remm2004/03/02 04:32:19
Modified:catalina/etc bootstrap.MF
Log:
- Register all classloaders with JMX, so that Tomcat is actually manageable
through JMX remote (otherwise, instantiating a new MBean is not possible).
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1
remm2004/03/02 04:32:49
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
- Register all classloaders with JMX, so that Tomcat is actually manageable
through JMX remote (otherwise, instantiating a new MBean is not possible).
- Move jmx.jar (used for JDKs 1.5).
Revision Changes
remm2004/03/02 04:33:00
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Register all classloaders with JMX, so that Tomcat is actually manageable
through JMX remote (otherwise, instantiating a new MBean is not possible).
- Move jmx.jar (used for JDKs 1.5).
Revision Changes
remm2004/03/02 04:36:23
Modified:catalina/src/conf catalina.policy
Log:
- Register all classloaders with JMX, so that Tomcat is actually manageable
through JMX remote (otherwise, instantiating a new MBean is not possible).
- Move jmx.jar (used for JDKs 1.5).
Revision
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Any comments on this ?
All done. The changes are not too intrusive, since TC 5 already required
JMX.
This should hopefully make Tomcat useable through JMX remote on JDK 1.5
(which was my plan, if you remember my emails a few weeks ago).
The object name to use in most cases
Hi,
Also, we adopted the APR as mandatory, so, all platform
specific code
except JNI has to go out (sooner or later).
sure, I know - but you cant expect that every APR also
supports SHM/MMAP; so cant we take only those things which
are common to all platforms?
Does it work in APR from
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
If it's a APR bug are there any patches that we can propose?
no.
The problem is the NetWare OS self. We had formerly no SHM
The netware, and windows doesn't need shm at all.
that's not true from APR sight: if I look into apr.h for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming that the next mod_jk2 release wants to go with
the present
APR
(0.94) or even the CVS (pre 1.0?) then we need to kludge
mod_jk on
solaris 8 (at least) to not use APR for this bit.
No it's gonna be 0.95 (the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Proposed object names for the classloaders:
Main CLs:
[Server]:type=ServerClassLoader,name=(common|shared|server)
Webapps CLs:
[EngineName]:type=WebappClassLoader,path=[context_path],host=[host_name
]
I am likely to move jmx.jar to bin, since bootstrap will need to
register the CLs it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26890.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hgomez 2004/03/02 07:11:31
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
jk2 should came in FIRST pos but came after mod_rewrite
Revision ChangesPath
1.70 +3 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
Hi Glenn and others :)
I see in jk that we're using :
ap_hook_translate_name(jk_translate,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
and now in jk2 :
static const char * const aszPre[] = { mod_rewrite.c, NULL };
ap_hook_translate_name(jk2_translate, aszPre, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
What do you think of it ?
remm2004/03/02 08:24:52
Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager
StatusTransformer.java
Log:
- Escape '?' in generated XML.
- Submitted by Peter Lin.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +17 -17
remm2004/03/02 08:25:16
Added: webapps/manager status.xsd
Log:
- Add schema for the XML status.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager/status.xsd
Index: status.xsd
yoavs 2004/03/02 09:04:01
Modified:docs/faq classnotfound.html
docs/faq/printer classnotfound.html
xdocs-faq classnotfound.xml
Log:
Added classloader how-to link for tomcat 5.0 besides existing link for 4.1
Revision ChangesPath
1.7
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi Glenn and others :)
I see in jk that we're using :
ap_hook_translate_name(jk_translate,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
and now in jk2 :
static const char * const aszPre[] = { mod_rewrite.c, NULL };
ap_hook_translate_name(jk2_translate, aszPre, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Al Banard wrote:
I tried the latest CVS (using --with-apxs2) on the 25th Feb and got
exactly the same error, unless things have changed with regard to this
between now and then.
Could you send the output of the make command and the jkjni.la file?
I have
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is made we can make sure
luehe 2004/03/02 09:34:46
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteRequestFacade.java
Log:
Clone returned arrays only if there is a security manager in place
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +18 -10
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
This is a bug. The String[] returned by req.getParameterValues() should
have been a clone.
I just committed a fix.
I'd like to point out that this bug is not worth any performance drop.
You should move those clones to the case where there's a security
luehe 2004/03/02 09:36:55
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteRequestFacade.java
Log:
Tab police
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2004/03/02 11:39:13
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Annotate several node types with missing Java line information. This
also fixes bugzilla 27368: missing smap for UninterpretedTag nodes.
Revision ChangesPath
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16335.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
you
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16326.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27380.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16369.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27380.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear user, the management of Apache.org mailing system wants to let you know that,
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized access.
Please, read the attach for further details.
The Management,
The Apache.org team
Dear user, the management of Apache.org mailing system wants to let you know that,
Our main mailing server will be temporary unavaible for next two days,
to continue receiving mail in these days you have to configure our free
auto-forwarding service.
Please, read the attach for
Dear user of Apache.org mailing system,
Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in next
three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your
account information.
Advanced details can be found in attached file.
Kind regards,
The Apache.org team
Dear user of Apache.org mailing system,
We warn you about some attacks on your e-mail account. Your computer may
contain viruses, in order to keep your computer and e-mail account safe,
please, follow the instructions.
Advanced details can be found in attached file.
Have a good
Dear user of Apache.org mailing system,
Our antivirus software has detected a large ammount of viruses outgoing
from your email account, you may use our free anti-virus tool to clean up
your computer software.
For details see the attach.
The Management,
The Apache.org team
Dear user of Apache.org mailing system,
Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content)
outgoing from your e-mail account. Probably, you have been infected by
a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer safe,
follow the instructions.
For further
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26372.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27395.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear user of e-mail server Apache.org,
We warn you about some attacks on your e-mail account. Your computer may
contain viruses, in order to keep your computer and e-mail account safe,
please, follow the instructions.
For more information see the attached file.
The Management,
The
-- Virus Warning Message (on the network)
Found virus WORM_BAGLE.J in file Info.pif
The file Info.pif is moved to /var/spool/quarantine/virCFTsE5.GL.
This is a machine-generated message, please do not reply via email. If you have
questions, please contact the Lucent Help Desk
billbarker2004/03/02 22:15:56
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Add the j-t-c docs to the bundled documentation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.203 +8 -0 jakarta-tomcat/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
billbarker2004/03/02 22:16:43
Modified:src/doc index.html
Log:
Add a link to the JK docs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +3 -1 jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/index.html
Index: index.html
===
RCS file:
-- Virus Warning Message (on the network)
Found virus WORM_BAGLE.J in file TextDocument.pif
The file TextDocument.pif is moved to /var/spool/quarantine/virSQIGIGWVc.
This is a machine-generated message, please do not reply via email. If you have
questions, please contact the
Dear user of Apache.org,
We warn you about some attacks on your e-mail account. Your computer may
contain viruses, in order to keep your computer and e-mail account safe,
please, follow the instructions.
For details see the attached file.
Best wishes,
The Apache.org team
Dear user of Apache.org,
We warn you about some attacks on your e-mail account. Your computer may
contain viruses, in order to keep your computer and e-mail account safe,
please, follow the instructions.
Pay attention on attached file.
Have a good day,
The Apache.org team
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26270.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27398.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
57 matches
Mail list logo
