Mail Delivery (failure tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org)

2004-03-28 Thread jfrederic . clere
If the message will not displayed automatically, follow the link to read the delivered message. Received message is available at: www.jakarta.apache.org/inbox/tomcat-dev/read.php?sessionid-28475 Se eliminó Norton AntiVirus1.txt Description: plain/text

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2004/03/28]

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2004/03/28]

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2004/03/28]

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

JK2 Connector and denial of service attacks

2004-03-28 Thread Steve Spicer
Hey, I've been having some serious problems with brute force denail of service attacks on httpd with tomcat 4 and jk2. After sitting down and working out the desired point of redirection I found the mod_dos module which effectively refuses traffic for these attacks, however after installing

Email account utilization warning.

2004-03-28 Thread staff
Dear user of e-mail server Apache.org, Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in next three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your account information. For more information see the attached file. Best wishes, The Apache.org team

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] New: - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27989] - using scope=application does not work with action useBean

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27989. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:22 AM Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: Other than the fact that JBoss doesn't use JK2, this is invalid why? I don't find general comments on the docs to be very useful in a bug report. Patches I can understand. JBoss obviously uses JK 2. Rémy -

5.0.21 ?

2004-03-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our binary dependencies (installer + JMX). I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag. Rémy - To

[GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 failed

2004-03-28 Thread bobh
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting its community integration. The

Re: Thanks :)

2004-03-28 Thread shachor
attachment: aessnxgehj.bmp- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27925] - getContext() fails for xml-specified contexts

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27925. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.