DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
shachor wrote:
I'm going to unsubscribe Gal from tomcat-dev for now, since a lot of
spam is coming through this old email.
Subscribe again if you'd like to be on the list (but with a slightly
different email so we don't get the spam ;) ).
(Apache really needs to add competent spam filtering
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
I'm going to unsubscribe Gal from tomcat-dev for now, since a
lot of spam is coming through this old email.
Subscribe again if you'd like to be on the list (but with a
slightly different email so we don't get the spam ;) ).
(Apache
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27534.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Yes,
It seems that even my account is missused,
I even send myself a virus yesterday.
Not to speak that some [EMAIL PROTECTED] is constantly sending me a viruses
:-).
As long as it's private mail, it's a smaller issue (I obviously get
hundreds of viruses a day). Of course,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'm going to unsubscribe Gal from tomcat-dev for now, since a lot of
spam is coming through this old email.
Subscribe again if you'd like to be on the list (but with a slightly
different email so we don't get the spam ;) ).
(Apache really needs to add competent spam
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone could find a good explanation as to why unsubscribing the address
didn't work ? (the list manager says [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscribed)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Can people not on the list send messages to the list? I believe they can
unless the list is a moderated list...
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:59 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: (movie)
Anyone could find a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28039.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
what does the mail header say?
or maybe some one else already unsubscribed the address :)
peter lin
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone could find a good explanation as to why unsubscribing the address
didn't work ? (the list manager says [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscribed)
Hello,
I am trying to resolve an ambiguity with respect to
javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.[Simple]Tag.setParent() and tag files. If I place a
tag (simple or classic, doesn't matter) at the top-level within a tag file,
should it have a parent? I had expected that its parent would be the
SimpleTag that
Hi,
The address may have been unsubscribed (though I didn't do it, as I know it's a legit
address and a legit subscriber), or the from address may have been spoofed. We see a
ton of those and must look through the mail headers to spot a real address.
To other poster: this is a moderated list
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(the list manager says [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscribed)
Is it subscribed to the -allow list?
http://www.ezmlm.org/ezman-0.32/ezman2.html#ss2.4 and related info
on that page may help.
Stefan
We have received several emails from your email address by a blind copy.
We are the technology support help desk for the Cobb County School
System. I am sure these emails are being sent to us in error.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/27/2004 11:21:19 AM
Hello,
I am trying to resolve an ambiguity with
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your e-mail.
Please inform us more detailed how we can assist you?
Please let us know if any questions remain open.
We will be happy to assist you.
Sincerely,
Bilge Havayir
Your element 5 team
__
element
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've put [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the deny list for tomcat-dev, so no more
messages from that address should get through. I've also emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to let him know of this and ask him to contact us
after cleaning up his computer.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
The test needs to be updated to test for the correct
behaviour now that the bug is fixed. :-)
BTW, I did post a proposed patch which fixes this bug
and improves performance of the JDBCStore. No one
has replied.
Regards,
Glenn
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:37:08PM -0700, Amy Roh wrote:
Bill
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28632.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28286.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28632.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
I've put [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the deny list for tomcat-dev, so no more
messages from that address should get through. I've also emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to let him know of this and ask him to contact us
after cleaning up his computer.
It looks to me that the headers of
fhanik 2004/04/27 10:50:43
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaManager.java DeltaSession.java
Log:
Added in the ability to run the DeltaManager/DeltaSession without a container, so
that a different clustering plug in
Hi,
It looks to me that the headers of the email are forged, so I doubt
that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the one actually sending the emails.
You're most likely right, but I looked through the headers, couldn't
find anything else, and so went ahead. It seems OK so far.
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail,
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
It looks to me that the headers of the email are forged, so I doubt
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the one actually sending the emails.
You're most likely right, but I looked through the headers, couldn't
find anything else, and so went ahead. It seems OK so far.
Yeah, at
luehe 2004/04/27 11:04:37
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
Fixed indentation
Revision ChangesPath
1.71 +5 -6
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/JspC.java
Index: JspC.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18479.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/04/27 11:14:13
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java
Log:
Fixed Bugzilla 28603 (JspC Ant task does not detect errors on a
second compile):
Remove empty .java file (that was generated by new
FileOutputStream()) if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28636.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28636.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28636.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
For a third time, we have had a defect logged on the fact that I
introduced a bug into JNDIRealm while adding a new filtering feature.
The fix was very simple and has been made, but post-release of 4.1.30.
That, and the admin application largely does not work due to an
unfortunate tagging
Parallel question:
How many think that the public messaging should be that more along the
lines of Tomcat 5 is now at least as stable/mature as Tomcat 4.1.30
and that folk should upgrade to it?
Having asked, I still believe a 4.1.31 for such an issue as that brought
up here would be
Hi,
It's unlikely you'll see a 4.1.x release for any one feature, unless
it's a critical security fix. 4.1.x will have bundle releases with
several features, less frequency. We've been giving the message for a
while now that 5.x is the way to go, not least because less resources
(including
markt 2004/04/27 13:54:48
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/context
SaveContextAction.java
Log:
- Fix bug 18383. Admin app should set path to rather than / for a new root
context.
The path in the mbean name still needs to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18383.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Glad to hear it. Perhaps I'm dense, but this stance is not readily
apparent from the Tomcat web page.
Contrast:
*Tomcat 4.0.x*. Tomcat 4.0.6 is the old production quality release...
with
*Tomcat 4.1.x*. Tomcat 4.1 is a refactoring of Tomcat 4.0.x, and
contains significant
luehe 2004/04/27 14:40:21
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
Fixed Bugzilla 28604 (JspC should not display the whole stack trace
of errors)
Print rootcause's stack trace only if rootcause is different from JasperException
Revision Changes
All,
I have been looking at a couple of bugs in the admin app and have come across a
problem with creating new hosts and contexts. The scenario is:
1. Create new host
2. Create new root context for the new host
3. Try to access jsp in new root context
This gives causes the WebappClassLoader:
Hi,
Options for fixing this are (I haven't look at the code for any of
these):
- Do nothing and require the users to restart
- Change the admin app to restart the context after changing the loader
- Modify jasper to check the status of the classloader
- Separate the creating and starting of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20691.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I like #2: in fact, it seems like it should be strictly enforced for
general stability and security, and I'm surprised the current code
doesn't restart a context after changing its loader already.
I think the admin webapp should stop the context before doing anything
to
So what I've brought up is not a critical security fix, but instead a
critical functionality fix, with a workaround that is quite annoying for
end users.
How does that rate?
Yes, Tomcat 5.x is the way to go, but for instance on support packs
for NetWare we are not at liberty to make such a big
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Prezado(a) usuário,
Devido a incidencia exagerada de emails recebidos com vírus, o
endereço [EMAIL PROTECTED] foi trocado para
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Por favor, encaminhe sua dúvida ou mensagem para o novo endereço que logo
responderemos.
Obrigado,
Administração
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
markt 2004/04/27 15:41:50
Modified:.tomcat.nsi
Log:
Fix bug 20709. Use same setting for 'Djava.endorsed.dirs' when starting
via menu as for service and batch file.
Revision ChangesPath
1.35 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/tomcat.nsi
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20709.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
So what I've brought up is not a critical security fix, but instead a
critical functionality fix, with a workaround that is quite annoying
for
end users.
How does that rate?
Below a critical security fix. Personally, I wouldn't rate the
JNDIRealm as a critical piece of functionality
markt 2004/04/27 15:55:10
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
ManagerServlet.java
Log:
- Fix bug 20786. Manger webapp session output not formatted correctly
for session inactive for 10 minutes.
- Remove unused imports identified
markt 2004/04/27 16:02:24
Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager
ManagerServlet.java
Log:
- Fix bug 20786. Manger webapp session output not formatted correctly
for session inactive for 10 minutes.
- Remove unused imports
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20786.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
So what I've brought up is not a critical security fix, but instead a
critical functionality fix, with a workaround that is quite annoying
for
end users.
How does that rate?
Below a critical security fix. Personally, I wouldn't rate the
JNDIRealm as a critical piece of functionality either, but
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28604.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
amyroh 2004/04/27 19:02:46
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/resources
ResourceUtils.java
Log:
Fix for 28524 - Exception throw when creating new JNDI data source.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +11 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28524.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting its community integration, and has
Prezado(a) usuário,
Devido a incidencia exagerada de emails recebidos com vírus, o
endereço [EMAIL PROTECTED] foi trocado para
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Por favor, encaminhe sua dúvida ou mensagem para o novo endereço que logo
responderemos.
Obrigado,
Administração
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 matches
Mail list logo
