DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29485.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jonathan Rengifo wrote:
Hi to all ...
I've install Apache2 and Tomcat5 last versions from the Apache project
web page, and they are currently well running standalone in my 64 bits
Solaris 9 Box, but now I need to connect them, so I installed the new
mod_jk2 connector, with succeeding results at
remm2004/09/08 03:38:14
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
InvokerHttpRequest.java
catalina build.xml
Log:
- Tweak the packaging of the resources for servlets (bug 31110).
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Your missing symbol is part of the runtime. I think that it is part of
the gcc runtime. Did you compile libapr with gcc? If so, then you have
to arrange to use the static gcc runtime (.a) or to at least include the
shared object in the list of link-time dependencies.
Hi,
Shoot, I forgot to include this in the announcement of the release ;( Sorry about
that. I left your message in my inbox precisely so I would remember...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Jeanfrancois Arcand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
In the latest TC 5.5.1 there are several jars in common/i18n
containing i18ned strings. Shoudn't these jars be added to o.a.c.
startup.catalina.properties so that the common.loader contains these
files? Not reporting this as a bug, since I'm not sure if it is one
;).
/regz
Dominik Drzewiecki
remm2004/09/08 05:56:34
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
catalina.properties
Log:
- Sync the catalina.properties which is in catalina.jar.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +7 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
How about next Tuesday, September 14th, for cutting release 5.5.2, and
next Saturday, the 18th, for cutting 5.0.29?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
How about next Tuesday, September 14th, for cutting release 5.5.2, and
next Saturday, the 18th, for cutting 5.0.29?
Is this a regular roll out or are there some serious problems
with 5.0.28?
Regards,
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
How about next Tuesday, September 14th, for cutting release 5.5.2, and
next Saturday, the 18th, for cutting 5.0.29?
Do we need 5.0.29 already ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi,
We don't need 5.0.29 already. But it's had a number of small bug fixes and
enhancements over 5.0.28. We can wait longer -- this is why I asked ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
This is just a nit, but in JspServlet.serviceJspFile() there is ...
synchronized(this) {
wrapper = (JspServletWrapper) rctxt.getWrapper(jspUri);
if (wrapper == null) {
// Check if the requested JSP page exists, to avoid
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24506.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/09/08 13:02:12
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java
Log:
Simplified check for existence of JSP by replacing call to
context.getResourceAsStream() with context.getResource(), as suggested by Tim Funk
Revision ChangesPath
1.38
Hi Tim,
Tim Funk wrote:
This is just a nit, but in JspServlet.serviceJspFile() there is ...
synchronized(this) {
wrapper = (JspServletWrapper) rctxt.getWrapper(jspUri);
if (wrapper == null) {
// Check if the requested JSP page exists,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29485.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30344.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31074.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31065.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The release notes say:
Redhat Linux 9.0 users should use the following setting to avoid
stability problems:
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
This simple shell script can tell you if you are running redhat 9:
if [ -f /etc/redhat-release ] grep -q Shrike /etc/redhat-release ; then
echo
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31132.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
We don't need 5.0.29 already. But it's had a number of small bug fixes
and enhancements over 5.0.28. We can wait longer -- this is why I asked
What bugs and enhancements have been made since 5.0.28?
-Dave
Tomcat developers,
I have created a plugin for Tomcat 5 that provides scalable session
clustering by replicating each session to a single node rather than
the whole cluster. The plugin uses the jcluster
(http://jcluster.dev.java.net) API for communication, membership and
failover, a BSD-licensed
36 matches
Mail list logo
