SV: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Jan H. Hansen
+1 I think burrying new potential contributors in auto generated spam is a bad practice. Regards Jan H. Hansen -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. april 2005 19:41 Til: Tomcat Developers List Emne: Re: New TLP draft Looks good. Just an idea, it

RE: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Actually, I'm -0 teetering on -1 for this ;) It's not spam, it's important information for everyone working on Tomcat. Frequently it's these emails that trigger the most serious discussions and the most catching of errors. It's easier for me to subscribe to one list and create rules to

Re: How Tomcat validates web.xml

2005-04-07 Thread N G
On Apr 6, 2005 10:07 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: N G wrote: On Apr 6, 2005 10:31 AM, Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SO, are you saying that even though Tomcat will accept whatever you put for the path to the Schema (since it uses its own copy), the app

Re: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Tim Funk
The main use case is when I lurked in geronimo. When a build in geronimo fails - it creates a *massive* email which I as a lurker really don't care about. It also took forever to download of a highspeed line. I also recevied wiki updates when subscribed to the cvs commits which I didn't care

Tomcat Connectors!!Help needed!!

2005-04-07 Thread Sharma, Meenakshi
Hello Everybody, I'm developing an application which is a java servlet, deployed on tomcat 5.5 Now, I want my application to take raw data from the client through sockets, for that it has to make a socket connection and listen that port for data. I've heard that we can create Connectors in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] New: - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34339] - commons-modeler.jar file missing from admin package

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Tim Funk wrote: The main use case is when I lurked in geronimo. When a build in geronimo fails - it creates a *massive* email which I as a lurker really don't care about. It also took forever to download of a highspeed line. I also recevied wiki updates when subscribed to the cvs commits which

Re: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Tim Funk
True. But do others really need to see the GUMP message if they don't want them? Since I should be reading the GUMP failures - it is mandatory for me to see them. But for any other dev lists one is subscribed to (but not committing) - do you really care that the latest build failed? Since the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34349] New: - cookies=false with request mit session cookie

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34349. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34339] - commons-modeler.jar file missing from admin package

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34349] - cookies=false with request mit session cookie

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34349. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34339] - commons-modeler.jar file missing from admin package

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: [X] Stable -- good build The build looks good to me. I would say it passes the TCK test, as Jan said the TCK status was still ok after making the nearly last minute getId change (which got reverted). Of course, I could be wrong. Rémy

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34346] - Webapp removal does not remove folder

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:17 AM Subject: Re: New TLP draft True. But do others really need to see the GUMP message if they don't want them? Since I should be reading

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34357] New: - Seg Fault in Apache 2 mod_jk.c

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34357. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34357] - Seg Fault in Apache 2 mod_jk.c

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34357. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34358] New: - loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34358] - loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tomcat Connectors!! Help needed!!

2005-04-07 Thread Ian Darwin
Do not use as many exclamation marks than words. Do not have as many words in your disclaimer as your query. Your technical question is addressed below... Sharma, Meenakshi wrote: Hello Everybody, I'm developing an application which is a java servlet, deployed on tomcat 5.5 Now, I want my

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34319] - StoreBase.processExpires() is very inefficient

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34319. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34361] New: - Using Manager ant tasks is messy

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34361. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34361] - Using Manager ant tasks is messy

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34361. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34361] - Using Manager ant tasks is messy

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34361. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34361] - Using Manager ant tasks is messy

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34361. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse JSSESocketFactory.java

2005-04-07 Thread billbarker
billbarker2005/04/07 19:49:50 Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse JSSESocketFactory.java Log: Add support for using Smart Cards as trust/keyStore. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +8 -8

Re: New TLP draft

2005-04-07 Thread Henri Yandell
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Here's a new draft with the necessary updates. I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft is ok, I will send it there. Then there are infrastructure taks: - renaming mailing lists To answer

web application request count and error count in tomcat manager servlet (tomcat mbeans..)

2005-04-07 Thread Annie Wang
hi, had a question about web application request count and error count from the tomcat manager servlet (which are also available via tomcat mbeans). initially, i was thinking that request count translates to total number of requests. and success count could be dervied by subtracting error count

RE: Tomcat Connectors!! Help needed!!

2005-04-07 Thread Sharma, Meenakshi
Hello Ian, Thanks! your suggestion helped me a lot. Can you plz. tell me whether a java application (Servlet) can be connected to a telnet tool? Regards, Meenakshi -Original Message- From: Ian Darwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:40 AM To: Tomcat Developers