Hi,
Commons-daemon is shipped with Tomcat. In fact, I believe it originated
in the Tomcat project and was moved to commons.
However it appears that there are no longer any active developers
working on commons-daemon. The number of bugreports in bugzilla for this
component is growing: currently
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jasper_tc5 has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26808.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32361.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2005/04/17 03:42:58
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe
Log:
Allow passing sperator chars (; and #) inside params by enclosing them
inside single or double quotes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +52 -52
mturk 2005/04/17 03:43:58
Modified:procrun/bin Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe
Log:
Backport from HEAD
Allow passing sperator chars (; and #) inside params by enclosing them
inside single or double quotes.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
pero2005/04/17 09:17:16
Modified:modules/cluster/test/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp
ReplicationTransmitterTest.java
Log:
correct name change
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34471.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give Remy something meaningful to benchmark against ;-).
Mladen did all the preliminary tests using the HTTP example server that
is in the mustang sources, which is a similar comparison.
It also has extra GC vs Remy's ChannelAprSocket.
... which will never exist ;)
I
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give Remy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34192.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I was finally able to run some benchmarks after I fixed my laptop. So
far I've only tested against the 5.5.4 to establish a base line. So
far what I found is 1000 concurrent keep alive connections is the
limit for my linux box. 500 is ok, but 1K concurrent connection over
loads my linux server. i
14 matches
Mail list logo
