Nathan Bubna wrote:
hey folks,
i'm a developer on the VelocityTools subproject, and we recently came
across an issue with the use of commons-logging in Tomcat 5.5.9.
by default, we configure our example applications to use an adapter
between commons-logging and Velocity's LogSystem. this way,
Ich werde ab 05.08.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
28.08.2005.
Bin im Militär. Bin zurück am 29. Juli. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie
sich bitte an Till Schober 032 626 08 27 oder Roland Käser 032 626 08 24.
Disclaimer: The contents of this email and any attachment thereto are
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36316.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks for all your help.
But I still have questions :-). I know that the body content of the tag is the
runtime entity. I think the value of some attributes is also runtime entity, if
its value can be EL. The method generateAttribute can generate the code in the
generated x_jsp.java file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36319.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Apache Tomcat 5.5.11-alpha, which includes bugfixes over Apache
Tomcat 5.5.10-alpha.
The Release notes are available at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/RELEASE-NOTES
Please refer to the change log for
remm2005/08/23 05:40:51
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Cleanup: remove a number of (apparently) useless files from conf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.235 +11 -0 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
remm2005/08/23 06:16:45
Modified:webapps/docs apr.xml
Log:
- Update Windows paragraph.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +7 -3 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/apr.xml
Index: apr.xml
===
At 12:00 19/08/2005 +0200, you wrote:
[snip]
Yes, it [tomcat] has to be called 6.0 because of
the new specifications release. Given the said
specification schedule, I don't see anything new
being included (besides code cleanup thanks to
the mandated Java 5 support) unless components get
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36329.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36289.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36329.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36316.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The method generateBody() is meant to continue to generate
codes for body of the tag, as usual. What you want is a method
to generate codes to get the body content, which is certainly
doable, but is not currently available. You are welcome to have
the first crack at extending the plugin
On 8/23/05, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
hey folks,
i'm a developer on the VelocityTools subproject, and we recently came
across an issue with the use of commons-logging in Tomcat 5.5.9.
by default, we configure our example applications to use an adapter
--- Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/05, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
hey folks,
i'm a developer on the VelocityTools subproject,
and we recently came
across an issue with the use of commons-logging
in Tomcat 5.5.9.
by default, we
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33650.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
20 matches
Mail list logo