It is annoying. I have a remote share on the network that is only static
files and I had to convince someone to create a WEB-INF folder on that share
and give them a nearly-empty web.xml. I would prefer to not have to maintain
it.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
suggested, a flag to change the behavior would also help.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 11:11 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Annoyance in the deployer
Cox, Charlie wrote:
It is annoying. I have
You can set your context to be privileged so that your login class in
WEB-INF\lib can access the \server\lib classes. But keep in mind anything
from your context can access tomcat's internal classes, so it is a security
risk.
Context ... privileged=true
Charlie
-Original Message-
Because a 4.1.x upgrade is not an api change. There is much more testing
involved in upgrading to a new major version than a point release. The
problem is finding the time to review the (possible)effects of 5.x on your
installation and all your applications when you could roll out a point
release
PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Where's 4.1.31?
Cox, Charlie wrote:
Because a 4.1.x upgrade is not an api change. There is much more testing
involved in upgrading to a new major version than a point release. The
problem is finding the time to review the (possible)effects of 5.x
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:07 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Some JK2 ideas v.3
Second reference to mod_coyote ?
Should we retains this one ?
Why wouldn't it be named mod_tomcat as Tim suggested?
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:58 AM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: Some JK2 ideas v.3
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
We should first determine if Apache2 will have to monitor a
This may be helpful in allowing more people to build jk/jk2 for windows.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Jeff White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Microsoft Compilers
quote
The Microsoft Visual
I didn't have time to look at it yet, but I was hopeful after seeing it on
the apache users list. Sorry for misleading...
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:18 AM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: [jk/jk2]
you want to put the one from endorsed into server/lib, then put yours in
WEB-INF. This way only one is visible to any tree of the classloader. But
I'm not sure if you will still end up with the JDK version since the one in
WEB-INF is not endorsed to override it.
The other thing I would try is to
still didn't see the reason how this endorsed mechanism
has anything to
do with the servlet spec., and that it would force servlet
container to skip
the one in webapps?
Thanks again.
William.
-Original Message-
From: Cox, Charlie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October
that the servlet spec. should supersede
the endorsed
mechanism in the web application environment.
William.
-Original Message-
From: Cox, Charlie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:17 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: Webapp classloader
for some reason this didn't get through to the list yesterday. If you get
this twice, I apologize
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Cox, Charlie
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:12 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: [next] What's next ?
-Original Message-
From
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: [next] What's next ?
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:
2. Eliminate the shared and common classloader
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: [next] What's next ?
Howdy,
2. Eliminate the shared and common classloader
repositories. Unless
these are required by
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [next] What's next ?
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I think this kind of classloading structure can be
configured in TC 5
I posted this to the user list and searched the archives to no avail , so I
have looked at the source code and need to know if this is a feature or a
bug as I'm not familiar with the AJP implementation.
I am using TC 3.2.3 w/IIS on Win2K
I have a servlet that servers a large file (50MB). The
17 matches
Mail list logo
