Re: integrating tomcat 4.04 into iplanet 4.1 using nsapi_redirector on linux

2002-08-01 Thread Simon Stewart
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:49:13AM -0500, Jerry Birchler wrote: > Has anyone done this? > > If so, I would like some help. I have compiled the redirector and validated > that it is getting invoked, my connector is up and listening, I validated > that the class files used for ajp13 are getting inv

Re: Mod_jk for Apache2.

2002-07-29 Thread Simon Stewart
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 07:39:55AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 19:49, Simon Stewart wrote: > > > Another spanner: the default anonymous cvs checkout of the current > > mod_jk2 doesn't build on linux. This is because the OS doesn't appear

Re: Mod_jk for Apache2.

2002-07-29 Thread Simon Stewart
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 07:11:51PM +0100, Dev Zero G Ltd wrote: > Without wishing to throw a spanner in the works :) I would like to point > out that we still have not been able to successfully build mod_jk, nor > make it work with the FreeBSD 4.x, Apache 2 and Tomcat 4.0.4 configuration. Anoth

Re: Jetty and mod_jk2

2002-07-09 Thread Simon Stewart
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:28:50AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Simon Stewart wrote: > > > > >Attached is a HOWTO on getting Jetty and Apache 2 talking via > > > >mod_jk2. Can I please get some feedback on this? And what do people > &g

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10541] - Content-length header should be automatically set for buffered Servlets/JSPs

2002-07-08 Thread Simon Stewart
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:49:17AM -0700, vicky kak wrote: > Hi, > I have already mailed you and informed you to remove > myself from your mailing list,but it seems no action > have been taken.I have mialed you on saturday but I > still got the posts on monday.Please remove my id from > your mai

Re: Jetty and mod_jk2

2002-07-04 Thread Simon Stewart
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:57:37AM -0700, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Simon Stewart wrote: > >The Jetty folks have been working hard on improving the connectivity > >between apache and jetty and so from 4.1.D2 Jetty has shipped with its > >own AJP13 Listener. According to Greg W

Jetty and mod_jk2

2002-07-04 Thread Simon Stewart
The Jetty folks have been working hard on improving the connectivity between apache and jetty and so from 4.1.D2 Jetty has shipped with its own AJP13 Listener. According to Greg Wilkins, the currently shipped version has problems with authenticated and SSL connections, but these are solved in the

JTC docs path --- root readme

2002-07-03 Thread Simon Stewart
If I get this wrong, then I fully expect people to point out my mistakes. Not sure whether you guys prefer multiple tiny email or ones like this In any case, attached are a number of diffs that I've made against the latest CVS version of jakarta-tomcat-connectors in a bid to try and improve th

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

2002-06-27 Thread Simon Stewart
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:32:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Simon Stewart wrote: > > > Will do. The most obvious thing that springs to mind is that the > > config files don't look anything like the declarative xml that is used > > when

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

2002-06-26 Thread Simon Stewart
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:19:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > While documenting the jk2 config, it would be _very_ usefull to > make some notes on how we can improve the configuration in > future. Will do. The most obvious thing that springs to mind is that the config files don't look

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

2002-06-25 Thread Simon Stewart
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 12:57 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Configuring mod_jk2 > > > > >

RE: Configuring mod_jk2

2002-06-25 Thread Simon Stewart
Just joined the list after Gomez Henri cc'd the mod_jk2 howto that I've been working here. If any of you want to correct any mistakes, or suggest areas where a little explanation wouldn't go amiss, please let me know. I'm now subscribed to this list, so there's no need to mail me directly (though