Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system
> properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute
> values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build
> scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurabil
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system
properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute
values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build
scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to
T
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)
> Henri Gomez wrote:
&
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ?
Possibly. Basically, if you have a "foo.bar" sys property, you can
put "${foo.bar}" in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the
property value (like in Ant). I didn't know t
Henri Gomez wrote:
Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ?
Possibly. Basically, if you have a "foo.bar" sys property, you can put
"${foo.bar}" in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property
value (like in Ant). I didn't know this was present in 3.3.
Ye
Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ?
Possibly. Basically, if you have a "foo.bar" sys property, you can put
"${foo.bar}" in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property
value (like in Ant). I didn't know this was present in 3.3.
Yes it was in TC 3.3.1 a
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Hi,
I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system
properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute
values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build
scripts. This would add an additional degree of
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Hi,
I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system
properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute
values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build
scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to
Howdy,
If it's easy, +1 ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:24 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and el
+0 (I'd be +1 if I could actually be of help - but love the idea)
-Tim
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system
properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute
values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its buil
Hi,
I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system
properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute
values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build
scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to Tomcat.
Actually, I wonde
11 matches
Mail list logo