Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system > properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute > values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build > scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurabil

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to T

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere) > Henri Gomez wrote: &

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ? Possibly. Basically, if you have a "foo.bar" sys property, you can put "${foo.bar}" in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property value (like in Ant). I didn't know t

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ? Possibly. Basically, if you have a "foo.bar" sys property, you can put "${foo.bar}" in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property value (like in Ant). I didn't know this was present in 3.3. Ye

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ? Possibly. Basically, if you have a "foo.bar" sys property, you can put "${foo.bar}" in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property value (like in Ant). I didn't know this was present in 3.3. Yes it was in TC 3.3.1 a

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to

RE: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, If it's easy, +1 ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-Original Message- >From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:24 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and el

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Tim Funk
+0 (I'd be +1 if I could actually be of help - but love the idea) -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its buil

[5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to Tomcat. Actually, I wonde